1995 Chrysler Concorde review from North America
"Excellent, comfortable, stylish, strong performer, excellent mileage"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Front disc brake rotors replaced twice due to shaking in the steering wheel.
Transmission fluid lines replaced due to leaks.
A bit more wind noise than it should have.
I would not begin to try to do anything under the hood, terribly crowded but fortunately, I never had a problem.
Expensive tune-up at 60,000 miles.
General comments?
Excellent performance from 3.5 engine.
Excellent heating and air conditioning.
25 to 27 miles per gallon consistently.
Very comfortable seats.
Excellent leg room and comfort.
Large trunk.
Muffler looked like it would last for 20 years.
I was told repeatedly that this car would fall apart within minutes of leaving the showroom. The weak spots were supposed to be the air conditioning system and transmission.
I never had a bit of trouble with either but I maintained the automatic every 30,000 miles.
I think Chrysler gets a bad rap, mainly from people who never owned one.
Recommended reviews
| Beautiful car, rides smooth when you can get it on the road |
|
| Great car, buy it - they tend to be cheap! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 1995 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.5 V-6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 32 miles |
| Most recent distance | 70000 miles |
| Previous car | Chrysler Concorde 1993 |
| Date of Entry | 21st February, 2001 |