1992 Ford Fiesta LX 1.1 petrol from UK and Ireland


A generally very good little car let down by poor performance


The temperature gauge failed.

The rear wiper motor failed.

The clutch ratchet failed.

Part of the dashboard illumination failed.

The front suspension legs had to be replaced.

There was a short circuit in the alternator which caused the battery to drain prematurely.

The car started smoking and using oil rapidly after about 70,000 miles. I am told that this is a common fault on HCS (high compression) versions of Ford's CVH engines. The tappets were also a bit loud, although this is again a common fault on Ford CVH engines. Neither of these problems will stop the engine running however, and can be kept under control with regular servicing.

General Comments:

Well, I must say that this was one very decent car on the whole.

The fault list looks worse than it actually was, as most of the faults mentioned didn't actually prevent the car from being driven.

The only other things I had to replace were service items such as brake pads and spark plugs etc. It also needed a new clutch at approx 60,000 miles, but this is to be expected at the end of the day.

There was a significant amount of rust along the sills, wheel arches and front/rear valances, although this is pretty much to be expected on a 10 year old vehicle. I wouldn't say that the car was worse than any other vehicle of a similar age. The remainder of the car was generally rust free, other than under the fuel cap (this is a common fault on mark 3 Fiestas without the little door that covers the fuel cap).

The car served me very well through three years of university, plus a few months either side.

Running costs were very good, with 45mpg easily achievable, although the insurance grouping was a tad high for a 1.1 at group 5.

I really must take my hat off to the Ford dealers I came into contact with. Not only were they reasonably cheap, but I rarely had to wait more than a couple of hours for servicing/repairs, and parts were almost always available on the spot.

Good though it was, the car was far from perfect though.

Performance was nothing short of pathetic (18.2 seconds 0-60mph) ; this was made worse by the fact that the car had a manual choke. On cold mornings it sometimes felt as if there wasn't even enough power to move off on level ground!

The ride and handling left a fair bit to be desired as well. Mark 3 Fiestas were designed at a time when Ford didn't seem think that any degree of driving enjoyment was necessary. A world away from the mid 1990's onward Fords without a doubt!

I must admit however that I was genuinely sorry to see the car go, and if its replacement (a mark 1 Clio) can be as good then I'll be very happy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th March, 2003

24th Mar 2004, 06:05

The HCS and CVH are two totally separate engines. The HCS was an evolution of the old pushrod "Kent" crossflow engine, and the engine that was fitted to your car. It's a prehistoric unit, having first appeared in 1959 in the Anglia. The tappet noise is a common problem, but as this engine has traditional adjustable tappets, is not usually anything to worry about.

The CVH was an overhead cam unit which appeared in the early 80's in the front drive Escort, although did appear in the Fiesta in 1.4 and 1.6 (including XR2/early XR2i) and in turbo form in the RS models. These have hydraulic tappets which, provided regular oil changes are carried out, are usually problem free.

1992 Ford Fiesta Ghia 1.3 from UK and Ireland


Better than any Vauxhall!!


New nearside drive-shaft at 79000 miles.

New Steering joint at 79000 miles.

New indicator stalk at 71000 miles.

Whole exhaust system at 58000 miles.

New cylinders and brake disc's at 71000 miles.`

General Comments:

I'm really happy with my Fiesta. I never have any trouble with starting, no matter how cold it is (always first time), I much prefer the manual choke versions to the automatic ones, theyre far less hasstle, automatic choke versions have annoying faults I find.

In the time I've owned the car, which is 1999-2003 and 26,000 miles, it has never failed to start or broken down on route.

The 1.3 engine is far more responsive than the 1.1, I find the 1.3 quite good on fuel economy and cruising on the motorway happily at 90mph.

Body work on the Mk3's can go, but touch wood, as yet I've had no problems with body work, slight surface rust round the wheel arches, but nothing that can be sorted in a matter of hours.

One final bit of advice look for LX rather than Ghia, because although the equipment is better, the 1.3 Ghia's fall into group 8 insurance, whereas the Lx's are only group 5.

A really good first car, reliable and good balance of economy and performance!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th January, 2003

13th Mar 2003, 07:24

My engine blew at 93k. This was both surprising and annoying.

The car was worth about £2000 and a brand new new engine/clutch etc in total came to a little over a £1000.

My choices were:

1. Buy new engine - the rest of the car is OK = £1000

2. Buy new car for £1000.

Obviously? I took option one. New 1.3 engine is very economic and purrs happily along. Nearly don 10k on it already through so oil change and service is on the cards.