2003 Ford Mondeo Reviews - Page 5 of 8

2003 Ford Mondeo 1.8 LX Estate 1.8 zetec from UK and Ireland

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 1.8 zetec Manual
Distance when acquired13400 miles
Most recent distance20400 miles
Previous carFord Mondeo

Summary:

Excellent family car that cruises happily on the motorway, even uphill with only a 1.8 engine

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong with the car in the year which we have owned it.

General Comments:

The 2003 Estate is slightly longer than the 1997 one which we previously owned. Everyone having a ride in the back comments on the huge amount of leg room, super for my tall family.

The esate is a very long car which can be difficult to park in the city.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th May, 2005

2003 Ford Mondeo Ghia 2.0 tdci 130 from UK and Ireland

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 2.0 tdci 130 Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.2 / 10
Distance when acquired11000 miles
Most recent distance31000 miles
Previous carFord Mondeo

Summary:

Excellent

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong with the car as such, but there is an annoying vibration that has been in the car since the last service.

General Comments:

I can say diesel with out wanting to spit.

The performance is outstanding. Far quicker that my previous 2.0 petrol motor's.

Economy at it's worst 39mpg in heavy traffic stop start to and from work. Best 56mpg long and quick motorway run.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 9th February, 2005

2003 Ford Mondeo Ghia X Estate 2.5 from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 2.5 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired7000 miles
Most recent distance16000 miles
Previous carFord Mondeo

Summary:

Even better than ever but let down by interior refinement

Faults:

Tailgate lock motor failed.

Persistent cold-starting problem.

General Comments:

Having owned a succession of earlier Mondeo estates and loved ‘em all, this review is written essentially as a comparison between the old and new versions.

For me the main advantage of the Mark III is its larger proportions, particularly with the considerable increase in rear legroom (having always been particularly poor on earlier models). The load bay is slightly larger, too, in both width and depth.

Contrary to what you may read in the press, however, the rear seat is not wide enough to comfortably accommodate three adults - though three children or two adults plus one child will be comfortable.

The ride quality is superior to previous Mondeos: pot-holes and speed humps being deftly handled. Road noise from the 17-inch alloys and Michelin lo-pro tyres is barely audible. Given the car’s enlarged dimensions, I was amazed to discover the handling is even better, too!

At last all four windows and the sunroof have one-shot opening and closing - a chronic penny-pinching omission from previous models. The anti-dazzle chromatic rear-view mirror is a real boon on motorways after dark.

Performance is reasonably good for such a large, heavy car, while I average 28mpg - admirable for a vee-six self-shifter.

The seats in Mondeos keep on getting better! Lateral, thigh and lower-back support is further improved on the previous high standards.

However with this pre-"facelift" model other aspects of the cabin are the car’s downfall. Ford continues its practical jokes over “executive” fascias: the “black wood” panelling representing a new low in tackiness. The shiny gearchange surround becomes a nuisance at night as it distractingly reflects street lamps as you pass under them. The plush leather cushioning one previously found on the door trims has been replaced with something akin to cheap hardboard that would disgrace a modern Lada.

The dashboard controls are logically situated as ever, but there is an unnecessarily long “throw” to the headlamp control paddle. Canted slightly away from the driver (presumably to suit left-hand drive markets), the “classically styled” (according to the brochure) ovoid analogue clock is impossible to decipher at a glance, especially after dark.

The climate control’s LCD readout for the cabin temperature is rather difficult to read ("Does it say 18.0 or 18.5?"). On the other hand, the amazing CD changer/Radio unit has an excellent display.

The trip computer display is now sensibly located within the instrument cluster, but the instant MPG, date and stopwatch functions have been dropped.

Previous Mondeos had an airflow feed direct to the front doors to provide side window demisting. This godsend has bizarrely disappeared from the new model.

The soft, pleasant warning chimes of earlier Mondeos have been deposed by a repertoire of frankly hideous tones. Thirtysomethings may remember a toy in the mid-1970s called “clackers”: I am reminded of these every time I activate the direction indicators – it even irks rear-seat passengers! Engaging reverse gear, running low on fuel, leaving the lights on and releasing the seatbelt all invoke crude peeps and bleeps that are just the wrong side of irritating. (The latter was so annoying that I disabled it permanently.)

To be honest the Mark I car had a more refined cabin for 1993 than the Mark III has for the new millennium. My guess is that in order to plough money into the Mondeo’s safety features, Ford have cut corners in quality and refinement. In fairness, though, a complement of six airbags and improvements to the bodyshell are all welcome.

Despite the aforementioned shortcomings, the interior is well screwed together. In fact the fixtures and fittings of the load bay are better than the agricultural approach of earlier Mondeo generations.

The 5-speed Durashift auto box needs more development work. Most of the time it works reasonably well, but can “jolt” noticeably when downshifting. This is a particular problem when descending steep hills as the box, presumably working in "intelligent" mode, downshifts to invoke engine braking. The effect of this is to cause the car's occupants to lunge forward. Even worse the box forgets to change back up a gear once on level ground. The box tends to "hunt" quite a bit too when travelling over constantly varying gradients - it's almost as though it has too many gears to choose from! Switching to "manual" mode provides smoother and punchier progress. Although the 3-speed-plus-overdrive set-up of yesteryear was a tad heavier on petrol, it performed perfectly in comparison.

Note for owners of sat-nav systems: although the Mondeo retains the extremely useful heated windscreen, I can attest that it does NOT cause signal interference problems for dashboard-mounted GPS receivers.

My car has manifested two faults so far. The tailgate locking motor packed up on the fourth day of ownership. This is apparently such a common problem that my local dealer always keeps a healthy stock of them! More annoying, however, is a persistent cold-starting problem which the dealer has been unable to diagnose. I’ve not been left stranded yet, but...

To summarise, if you’re expecting executive refinement on the top-of-the-range machine, look elsewhere. However if you’re in the market for a cheap, reliable, versatile, smooth-riding, well-built, fully-loaded, practical, performance family ultrafreighter, the Mondeo has to be on your list!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th January, 2005

3rd Feb 2005, 12:15

Does it really matter that you can't read the 0.5oc difference on the climate control display?? I can read mine! See an optician.

29th Oct 2005, 06:44

UPDATE. The car has now covered almost 30,000 miles. The gearbox started to improve after 20,000 miles and is now almost perfect in operation. The cold-starting problem has disappeared entirely. Both problems have ameliorated "naturally" - ie not through dealer fixes.

Other than that, the car has remained utterly fault-free and relatively cheap to run. Am definitely going for the aesthetically-superior "facelift" version next time! (Very annoying that the sunroof is no longer standard even on the top-spec model, though!)

Average review marks: 7.9 / 10, based on 27 reviews