1993 Ford Telstar Reviews

1993 Ford Telstar 2.5 petrol from South Africa

Model year1993
Year of manufacture1993
First year of ownership1993
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission 2.5 petrol Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.6 / 10
Distance when acquired19000 kilometres
Most recent distance163000 kilometres

Summary:

Excellent, and very underrated

Faults:

CV joints at 80000.

Dashboard storage compartment's closer springs are broken.

General Comments:

Excellent low maintenance luxury car with good performance and excellent road holding. Less fuel efficient, but still compares good with other similar cars.

Very reliable. Owned it for 17 years, and still in excellent condition and going strong. Done 163000 km.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 20th June, 2010

14th Jan 2011, 07:25

Hi all.

I've been driving a Ford Telstar 2.0 GLE for 4 years now. Before I bought it, I didn't even wanted a Ford for free!!

But now, I won't change it for anything!! As I'm working for a Ford agent now, I pimped it quite a bit for next to nothing.

I fitted Tickford Falcon 17" mags (only set in SA), redid the whole front & rear suspension, fitted all mountings, black leather seats, new roof lining, door panels, fitted electric windows, double din DVD/nav system, etc, all out of the Ford warehouse. It looks wicked, I love it. And it's light on juice!! I get +-900km on a tank at 140km/h!! Want a car? Buy a Telstar!!!!

7th Jun 2011, 08:05

I agree, I had a 2.0 1994 Telstar DOHC 16V for 6 years, and it kicked ass all the way. Stunning car.

1993 Ford Telstar TX5 2.0 from Australia and New Zealand

Model year1993
Year of manufacture1993
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 2.0 Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.5 / 10
Distance when acquired200000 kilometres
Most recent distance260000 kilometres
Previous carFord Falcon

Summary:

Comfortable when it works

Faults:

I bought this car second hand with a fairly high mileage, so of course it is going to have problems.

Car vibrated/shook at idle - replaced 3 of the engine suspension supports reduced the problem significantly approx. $300 (AUD) each, this is just for parts.

Boot hydraulics would not hold up the hatch tailgate; needed to re-gas, approx. $60 (AUD) each, just parts.

Water pump broke, $1000 (AUD) to replace, including labour.

Radiator started leaking, cost $600 (AUD) for a non-genuine one, again just the part.

Needed to replace parking light (my fault) $320 (AUD)

General Comments:

The interesting thing is that Mazda 626 parts (same car) are cheaper than Ford parts; it's as if Ford buys from Mazda and then resells to the consumer.

Overall, a comfortable car, good for city driving. It is not a fast car by any standards, but will suffice in day to day driving.

Fuel wise, I got 10.5-11L/100km in the city and about 8L/100km on the freeway.

The car is fairly roomy for a medium sized car of that generation, and is very well equipped.

Parts however are extremely expensive, and that's the main problem with this car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 25th November, 2007

3rd Apr 2011, 14:45

Wow. I'm glad I don't live in your area. I got my radiator for $270 NZ dollars.

20th Mar 2013, 21:39

I do not know where you are buying your parts, but STOP! I bought a radiator for $109 with free delivery. Water pump cost me (new) $60. Hatch struts $29. Parking light, front, $30. Seriously ripped off! Ebay is your friend, just be careful of the scammers.

1993 Ford Telstar AX 2.6 lt V6 from Australia and New Zealand

Model year1993
Year of manufacture1993
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 2.6 lt V6 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 0 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 0 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
2.4 / 10
Distance when acquired110000 kilometres
Most recent distance1640000 kilometres
Previous carToyota Hi-lux

Summary:

A nice car let down by parts prices!

Faults:

Ignition fault at 164,000. Had to replace the distributor, a new one cost me $1,157.00, for a couple of bucks worth of cast alloy, some pressed sheet metal parts, a coil and some bits of plastic!

Drive train noise undiagnosed as yet.

General Comments:

For all of its good looks, handling and comfort, the Telstar is seriously let down by the price of parts.

The rear hatch tail light facia panel for instance, which is just just a piece plastic with the reverse lights and number plate lights in it, believe it or not it costs $1,200.00 to replace!

If you were to build a car from parts it would work to be worth over $100,000.00. How do you justify the cost of the parts?

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 23rd December, 2005

1993 Ford Telstar GL 2.0 V6 from South Africa

Model year1993
Year of manufacture1993
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 2.0 V6 Automatic
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.8 / 10
Previous carNissan Sentra

Summary:

This is a very comfortable albeit somewhat unreliable vehicle

Faults:

The drivers door was damaged after another car rode into it which resulted in neither the drivers nor right passenger door being able to open.

The central locking/alarm/immobiliser stopped working after about 7 months.

The gearbox needed replacing 2 months after we got the car. About a month ago the replacement (new not reconditioned) gearbox also packed up and now the car is just standing idle.

Fuel consumption is very high.

The electric window mechanism on the two back door stopped working. On the back driver's side it doesn't work at all while on the back passenger side it can go down, but not up. All of the windows can however be operated from the driver's door.

General Comments:

Other than the above mentioned faults, this car is still very good and handles well.

I don't have any complaints about the interior and I find it very comfortable.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 21st December, 2005

Average review marks: 6.5 / 10, based on 8 reviews