1993 Ford Tempo Reviews - Page 2 of 11

1993 Ford Tempo GL 2.3 liter from North America

Model year1993
Year of manufacture1993
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.3 liter Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.3 / 10
Distance when acquired80000 kilometres
Most recent distance165000 kilometres
Previous carOldsmobile 98

Summary:

Reliable; more so than our Toyota.

Faults:

The horn pad on the steering wheel has failed twice.

The master cylinder and metering valves have failed.

The air conditioning pump has become noisy.

General Comments:

A very reliable car.

An excellent engine; the 2.3L is actually the old Falcon straight 6 from the 1960's, with two cylinders lopped off, so it is a very strong 4 cylinder. It has a chain, instead of the usual Japanese timing belt (that needs to be replaced every 80,000 km.)

The seats are so, so fine.

The performance is fine.

The gas mileage is around 28 mpg average.

I like it.

It has cost much less (for repairs) than our Toyota of the same year.

There is no timing belt to replace, a-la the Japanese.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 5th July, 2008

1993 Ford Tempo GL 2.3 4 cylinder from North America

Model year1993
Year of manufacture1993
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.3 4 cylinder Automatic
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 2 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.8 / 10
Distance when acquired90000 miles
Most recent distance136000 miles

Summary:

One die-hard ugly car!!

Faults:

Normal wear and tear.

Suspension is weak.

Wheel bearings don't last too long.

ower window motors go out occasionally.

Windows easily fall off track.

General Comments:

Although small things do go out, this vehicle is very reliable.

Good for gas, and road trips.

Good in snow with the right set of tires.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th January, 2008

1993 Ford Tempo GL V6 3Ltr from North America

Year of manufacture1993
First year of ownership1996
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission V6 3Ltr Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.5 / 10
Distance when acquired50000 miles
Most recent distance255000 miles
Previous carToyota Camry

Summary:

Tough, reliable and inexpensive

Faults:

Nothing that caused a breakdown.

General Comments:

I used to have a courier company and we had a few Tempo’s in the fleet. An unusual choice of vehicle for this type of work perhaps, bet they had just come off lease and we got a good deal on them. The Tempo’s proved to be the most reliable, most cost efficient of all other types including VW’s and Toyotas. I still have one, a 93 V6 auto. It has a quarter of a million miles on it and has never failed to start, not once! Obviously it’s had parts replaced such as brakes, steering gear and shocks etc, but the engine and transmission are original and still perform well. Fuel consumption average is 25MPG / 10Lts/100 Kms. What amazes me the most is that there is virtually no rust on the car and this is in Canada.

The exhaust emissions testing centre where I get my emissions test done told me that the V6 Tempo/Topaz has one of the cleanest burning engines. They have never had one fail the test!

If anyone is looking for cheap, basic transportation and comes across a decent Tempo/Topaz for sale, grab it!

No, I am not a Ford Tempo freak lol, my main ride and first love is a BMW 325, but I do believe in singing the praise of a job well done and Ford got it right on these cars.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 21st March, 2007

12th Jul 2008, 18:14

You are so right!

The Tempo is an absolutely amazing little car that is under rated.

Part of the reason is the great little engine. Did you know that it is the old 1960s Ford Falcon straight 6 (200 cid) with two cylinders removed (140 cid)? That old design demonstrated that new technology is not necessarily better. GM did the same with the famous 3.8l v6, actually a 1960 olds v-8 with two cylinders lopped off.

We have had several Tempos, and they are more reliable than our Toyotas.

14th Jul 2008, 04:01

I would like to second the above comment about old technology being more durable/reliable than new. The older push-rod all-cast-iron engines are far better than the new overhead-cam aluminum ones. The slight increase in mpg and power per liter isn't worth the added complexity.

29th Nov 2008, 03:45

Pushrod motors are so reliable and under rated. The Buick Grand National is a prime example. Everyone thinks this supercar had some high-tech engine, but it has a blown 3.8 v-6, the exact pushrod non-overhead cam engine that Buick robbed from its own 350 v-8 of 1961 by removing two cylinders.

The Buick v-6 powered many plain jane regals and family cruisers, and Jeep even bought the engine for awhile in the '60s.

The 2.3 Tempo engine is exactly the same idea. An old Falcon 6 with two cylinders removed.

Too bad new cars have gotten so high-tech no one can fix them.

Average review marks: 7.0 / 10, based on 35 reviews


Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews