2000 Mazda Premacy LX review from Netherlands
"Not complete enough for that money"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
No problems with the car, start always.
General comments?
They sold the Car to me telling me it was build on the 626 Base. After a couple of month I discovered that this was not true!! It is based on th 323.
It's to noisy, and not complete enough for the money that it cost.
Missing Variable interval on wipers back and front.
Missing control light for window washer level.
Missing temprature indicator on the dashbord (frost detection).
Missing Sun-roof is not available on this model when you want a TDI engine.
It's a fine car, but when you drive more than some kilometers per day, it is not good enough. Will I buy an other Mazda YES!! a Premacy? Never again.
Recommended reviews
| Very well built and a pleasant drive |
|
| It's good for the money, but it's not great |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | DTI 2 Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 5 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 149000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Mazda 626 |
| Date of Entry | 7th March, 2003 |