1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT Reviews - Page 4 of 4

1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT from North America

Year of manufacture1995
First year of ownership1997
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.4 / 10
Distance when acquired23000 miles
Most recent distance107000 miles
Previous carFord Probe

Summary:

Keep up with V-8 Mustangs no problem

Faults:

Other than the normal wear and tear like, timing belts, clutch, brakes, and one pulley that goes out about every 40000 miles. That's it!!!

General Comments:

I love this car!!! I'm going to keep it for a couple of more years, but I want somthing with more room. If it was practical I would keep it forever.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th October, 2002

20th Jun 2004, 21:30

In regard to the first comment, I do not believe that the reviewer had a VR4. Your comment seems to be out of left field. Just an observation.

25th Apr 2007, 14:07

Ha ha, These cars can keep up because Mustangs are slow when they have a 4.6L V8 that puts out 260hp. Compare that to a 3000gt 3.0L DOHC 24v V6 that's rated at 222hp. Mitsubishi is simply more efficient and more reliable.

26th Aug 2007, 22:52

Most people judge a cars speed capabilities by looking at the horsepower. I don't own a VR4 nor have I ever ridden in one. But I do know that the VR4 engine puts out less horsepower than a V8 mustang. However, this means nothing because the Mustang weighs substantially more than the VR4. This, in turn, translates to more Horsepower per ton for the VR4 compared to the Mustang which makes for better acceleration and top speed as well as cornering. In short, (despite the marketing for the VR4) the VR4 is simply a better performance car...Oh, and I think it looks WAY better than any mustang made in the last 30 years.

18th Dec 2009, 14:21

Check the 0-60 times on the 3000GT... 8.5 seconds? The Mustang 5.0 was 6.2 and the '99 and up cars are less than 6. So how does your car keep up with cars over 2 seconds quicker to 60?

The 3000 GT was well known for its hefty weight which made it slow unless you had the VR4. Even the VR4 could have been faster had they shed some of the tremendous weight it had. These were cool cars in their day, though, although I never liked how small they were inside given they were so big on the outside.

1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT Standard 3.0 from North America

Year of manufacture1995
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2001
Engine and transmission 3.0 Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.3 / 10
Distance when acquired54000 miles
Most recent distance57000 miles
Previous carDodge Stealth

Summary:

A lot of bang for the buck

Faults:

Nothing major has gone wrong with the car yet.

I just replaced the timing chain and water pump at 57,000 and it cost me $740.

The CD changer has failed and it is $325 from the dealer.

General Comments:

Very fast car! Leather and power seats make it a very comfortable ride. It handles very nice. For the price it is a beautiful car and looks great!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th November, 2001

Average review marks: 7.7 / 10, based on 12 reviews