1979 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Reviews

1979 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Royale 5.7 liter 350 gasoline from North America

Model year1979
Year of manufacture1978
First year of ownership1982
Most recent year of ownership2012
Engine and transmission 5.7 liter 350 gasoline Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.8 / 10
Distance when acquired9800 miles
Most recent distance107000 miles
Previous carOldsmobile Regency

Summary:

A great pity that GM abandoned the brand. Great cars

Faults:

Air conditioner compressor is the weak link in the mechanical system. I've replaced it several times. Otherwise, routine maintenance, which includes periodic replacement of fuel pump, water pump, master cylinder, etc.

Cosmetically the car has been reupholstered twice, painted several times, with replacement of the vinyl top, and waxed regularly.

General Comments:

The car is comfortable, on short errands, and long road trips.

It has plenty of power, from the extremely durable 350 Oldsmobile engine.

I enjoy driving the car, which handles the road very nicely.

I bought the car with the intention of keeping it for quite a while, but had no idea at the time that I would end up owning and driving it for more than thirty years. Just can't find a reason to get rid of it.

I update this review every few years on this site, and now that I'm an old man, I honestly believe this will be my last car. It has fewer than 150K miles on it, and at least that many left in it, so it will most certainly outlast me.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 3rd October, 2012

3rd Oct 2012, 10:07

If you posted the review of this car on 9/4/03, it had 108K miles.

Now it has 107K miles (?)

3rd Oct 2012, 14:25

An approximation of mileage. Not exact. Probably mistaken in previous estimate. Should be more precise.

3rd Oct 2012, 14:41

Unfortunately GM, like many companies, discontinues great products. It is sad not everyone shares our taste! I had 2 Buick Park Avenues that I loved, and would have gladly shelled out over $40K for another brand new one. At least I can still buy Buicks, which isn't the case for Olds, however none of the new ones are as appealing to me as my Park Avenues.

4th Oct 2012, 20:33

Considering that was 9 years ago, I'd say the mileage was way off - unless you don't drive it.

11th Oct 2012, 01:09

My main driver is, and has been the Oldsmobile, which as I've said repeatedly, is an excellent car, but I should add that I was clearly mistaken about the previous mileage estimate, probably owing to either a senior moment, or the fact that I had two other cars at the time, and probably didn't remember the mileage on the Olds correctly. Certainly not any attempt to mislead anyone.

My other two cars were a '67 Chevrolet that belonged to my dad, which is currently undergoing restoration, and a BMW, which proved costly to maintain, and so I sold it. Had I been able to afford it at the time, I would probably have bought a BMW 3.0 CSI, which has since become a classic, but the price tag was out of my ballpark at the time. The Bavarias were also nice cars, but common sense finally prevailed and I reverted to the cars with which I had grown up, G.M. products.

The low mileage on the Olds is due to the fact of rotating it among three cars I was driving at the time, and as I've grown older, I find I only put two or three thousand miles a year on it. So it should take me to the end of the line.

Thanks for your interest, and for pointing out my error. My opinion of the Olds stands. Wish they still made them; I might buy another one just for kicks.

1979 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Royale 350 diesel from UK and Ireland

Model year1979
Year of manufacture1979
First year of ownership1990
Most recent year of ownership1995
Engine and transmission 350 diesel Automatic
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 2 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.3 / 10
Distance when acquired97000 kilometres
Most recent distance114000 kilometres
Previous carHumber Sceptre

Summary:

A fine car, apart from the engine

Faults:

Rust, not good when I bought it, although it didn't get much worse.

Re-cored radiator.

Rebuilt brake caliper.

Engine rebuilt twice.

Batteries replaced (it has two).

Starter motor replaced.

General Comments:

My first American car, very comfortable. I was surprised at how few creature comforts I took for granted in European cars were absent. No reclining seats, no back seat armrest, hand cranked windows, the rears only went down halfway - I subsequently found this on a lot of American cars.

However it had comfortable seats and plenty of legroom front and rear, and the trunk was huge, despite the spare wheel taking up a lot of space.

Performance was smooth rather than swift, and the transmission was very smooth.

It was a very good tow car.

Handling was better than I expected, although not great, and it had a remarkable turning circle for such a large car - I could park in amazingly tight gaps.

I replaced the dim sealed beam headlights with Hella halogen lights (a straight swap).

The wiper switch wasn't on a stalk, but I soon got used to it.

American cars don't seem to have headlight flashers; this was disconcerting at first, and I liked the foot operated dip switch.

I wish I had known more about the diesel engine when I rebuilt it. It seems the early engines were a disaster, but later ones (and rebuilt units from Goodwrench) were much better. I didn't know enough about these engines when I rebuilt them; consequently I didn't do the job properly, and gave up on the car when the crankshaft snapped.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th October, 2011

28th Oct 2011, 13:46

Wow. A diesel Oldsmobile. It's hard to believe one of those somehow made it to Ireland, because those are some pretty rare cars. You hardly ever see them in the US. I only know one person that had one. He had an '84 Delta 88 with a diesel. It was OK. Pretty sluggish, decent fuel economy, nice interior. Back then diesel was extremely cheap, so it cost nothing to drive. So - how did that thing get over there?

28th Oct 2011, 18:08

The problem with the early 350 diesels were that the head bolts would stretch from the high compression, which caused blown head gaskets. Back then, even dealership mechanics would complete the repair, reinstalling the old head bolts, not knowing this was the problem in the first place, until it happened again 20,000 miles later.

When this problem was resolved by late 1984, the engines were proven reliable, but by then, the reputation was already tarnished, and they were discontinued after 1985. Even today, if you rebuild one using the new high strength head bolts, you will have a good, reliable, fuel efficient engine. Also a water separator (which was not available back then) and better quality diesel fuel help out a lot too.

3rd Nov 2011, 07:05

The car was in England, not Ireland.

It came from Belgium into this country, I don't know if it was sold new in Belgium though, I bought it from someone else in England.

Most older American cars were either imported by enthusiasts or sold by American servicemen stationed in England, returning to the USA.

I understand Uncle Sam would bring a car over for their servicemen, but not take them back.

Most of them were young men's cars, Camaros/Firebirds, Mustangs, Mopar muscle and similar.

However no doubt some senior servicemen ran family cars such as mine.

Average review marks: 7.8 / 10, based on 8 reviews