1991 Pontiac Sunbird GT review from North America
"A good and relabel starter sport car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Paint on the wing started to fade after the car hade been on the road for 6 years
The fog light bolts broke and I had to replace them in 2003
Paint is starting to fade off of the cars front bumper.
General comments?
It took 14 years for the alternate to go bad on the car
The paint stile looks like new and yes it is the factory paint
The intier stile looks like new
All of the lights work and have never been changed
Less has gone wrong than have gone bad.
Recommended reviews
| A quick little compact at a cheap price that will give most cars a run for their money |
| 1990 - Sunbird SE 2.0 Non-turbo Good Car, Very High Maintenance Cost |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Model year | 1991 |
| Year of manufacture | 1991 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.1 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 20000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 250140 miles |
| Previous car | Pontiac Sunbird |
| Date of Entry | 21st November, 2005 |