Proton Perdana Reviews - Page 2 of 3

1995 Proton Perdana Sei 2.0 L4 from Malaysia

Model year1995
Year of manufacture1995
First year of ownership1995
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 2.0 L4 Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.0 / 10
Distance when acquired300 kilometres
Most recent distance176832 kilometres
Previous carPerodua Kancil

Summary:

Price Cheaper

Faults:

Suspension cannot support high speed cornering.

Petrol usage not cost effective.

Over steer occurred.

General Comments:

I've test the max speed of this car can reach over 200km/h. (approx)

Starting pickup nor strong as expected.

Weight is high.

Plastic interior.

No CD changer at original.

Poor sound system.

Very powerful car after the speed reach over 70km/h.

Poor noice protection.

ABS provided give higher secure on user.

Cannot go too fast when cornering, over steer will occured.

When speeding up on a very straight road, such as highway, it is very stable.

No leather seat.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 18th February, 2005

2003 Proton Perdana V6 2.0i 2.0i V6 from Malaysia

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 2.0i V6 Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.4 / 10
Distance when acquired30 kilometres
Most recent distance35000 kilometres
Previous carProton Wira

Summary:

Value for money if and only if problems inherent in transmission and suspension are rectified.

Faults:

Transmission is disappointing. On several occasions (at 11 months old), gear "D" and "2" didn't work. Had to go for the "L" to move the car, before could switch to the "2" and "D".

Transmission produces jerk when changing gear.

Vibration felt too early. Don't know what the cause is, but think that from engine mounting (it is possible?). At the speed 110 km/h and above, vibration felt coming from the front cigarette ashtray and right-hand air-condition hole.

Think that suspension has deteriorated so fast. Can feel significant difference driving off from showroom and present.

General Comments:

Power is acceptable.

Ergonomics.

Economical.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 5th November, 2004

17th Dec 2006, 21:09

Sounds like a batch problem. I have the same car minus the alleged problems. :-)

2000 Proton Perdana PV6 2.0 V6 from Malaysia

Model year2000
Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 2.0 V6 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 3 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance78000 kilometres
Previous carProton Wira

Summary:

Value for money for the price range

Faults:

No major overhauls.

General Comments:

Final comment for this PV6 is: For those who comment that the PV6 is old technology. You are lucky that your get the top of the line tech in the late 90s, not some reject tech from the 80s. If you still want fancy tech for your car, Yes go for the BMW where you get all the fancy tech. It good, not bad at all. But is just you are paying for R & D cost now. Thank you.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 24th October, 2004

2002 Proton Perdana perdana v6 6A12TT from Malaysia

Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 6A12TT Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.4 / 10
Distance when acquired30000 kilometres
Most recent distance48000 kilometres

Summary:

Very good super saloon

Faults:

The car so far has been serving me as a very good servant. There are no problems at all with the car. Except that the front seats are not very comfortable for long distance driving or when stuck in jam. The leather used to cover the seats seemed to expand. There was no problem with the suspension accept that it has to be changed to a better suspension like TEIN with better spring for better traction and stability.

General Comments:

The Perdana V6 is indeed a very good car in it's class. Its worth it to pay 100k for this 2.0 litre car. It's a smooth car with quite a good handling at almost every cornering. However interior needs 'redecoration' especially on the dashboard and seats.

My dear friends, don't buy a Perdana V6 if you have lots of cash. If its possible, please stop with the grumblings and complains by comparing a Perdana V6 with a BMW X5 or any other continental cars as there is a big gap between the price of these cars. Thank you.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th August, 2004

24th Oct 2004, 05:19

May I know which model of TEIN absorbers you bought for your PV6? And which springs you compliment it with for street performance. Thank you.

21st Dec 2005, 22:05

I used to drive a 2003 Proton Perdana V6 and found it to be a good car until I met a friend who offered me to test drive his 2000 BMW 523i. I became envious of his car although the BMW seems to be slightly less roomy than my Perdana. Then I met my former boss who showed me his Mercedes E270 CDI when we were in Genting with our families. Within 5 months, I bought an avantgarde Mercedes E270 CDI. I am very happy with my choice still. Mind you, the Proton Perdana isn't a bad car though, just in a different class altogether.

1999 Proton Perdana 2.0 from Singapore

Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership1999
Engine and transmission 2.0 Automatic
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 3 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.8 / 10
Distance when acquired50 kilometres
Most recent distance3550 kilometres
Previous carDaewoo Espero

Summary:

Don't waste money on a Proton until another new model arrives

Faults:

The car looks cheap. The plastics feel very tacky. Although it has been facelifted, it does not look any better as it still looks very slab-sided. I preferred my Espero as it was more comfortable and responsive.

The Perdana should be given a new model instead of a facelift as the international markets desire for something more adventurous and up to standard such as the Nissan Cefiro, or at least, the Hyundai Sonata.

The Wira is hopeless as it is already like 12 years old. Change it, please. The Waja (Impian) is a fine effort, better than the Perdana, but, the exterior design should be more cutting-edge and sporty.

Proton should really revamp its range as people desire for cars with high standards at a budget price. I believe that Proton can do much better than this.

Now, I am driving a Daewoo Tacuma as I feel that it is more satisfying to drive than any Proton, and at a budget price too.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 9th February, 2004

22nd Aug 2004, 11:00

the perdana is out of date with manufacturer stilll using 1997 version of mitsubishi. the engine mounting was faulty in my 2 month old car and the engine is making funny noise. the interior looks like the non v6 version and l feel they should provide more as we are paying more. what about a rm 2000 airbag.

Average review marks: 6.0 / 10, based on 13 reviews


Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews