1992 Renault 19 Reviews

1992 Renault 19 TXE 4 cylinder from Australia and New Zealand

Model year1992
Year of manufacture1992
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 4 cylinder Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired105000 kilometres
Most recent distance121000 kilometres
Previous carRenault Ford Laser

Summary:

Reliable, but maintenance is a must

Faults:

Required a new radiator.

Required new shock absorbers (expensive)

Wheel bearing broken at 120,000 k's (also expensive to fix)

Automatic Transmission warning light has come on, after 2 days of rain,& then the warning light stopped coming back on & it is difficult for the repairers to diagnose the source of the problem, but problem mysteriously stopped.

General Comments:

The car does cost more for certain parts & repairs, being an uncommon car outside Europe & only certain mechanics, & repairers can do the repairs properly.

The car is virtually rust free, & I have never garaged it, over the last 2 years. The body is strong, & is near perfect, considering the age of the car.

The car can give trouble to start when the car is hot or after it has been running. I had this problem cease by avoiding high octane petrol, as the car is older, & not designed for it.

The car can heat up very quickly in traffic,& the fan will kick in, but travels perfectly when on the high way, out of traffic... the temperature stays nice & low when the car is at a good speed.

The petrol consumption is fantastic.

It's a handsome, unique car, but probably best suited to someone who has knowledge with French cars, & someone who can keep up with the maintanence & care.

I must say, for the 2 yrs I have owned this car, I have got around everywhere, with no problem, so I can't fault the car for reliability.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 25th January, 2006

1992 Renault 19 16v 1.8 16v from Sweden

Model year1992
Year of manufacture1992
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 1.8 16v Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.8 / 10
Distance when acquired17000 kilometres
Most recent distance17500 kilometres
Previous carCitroen BX

Summary:

Seriously fast on twisty roads, but lacks quality

Faults:

You couldn't open the right frontdoor from the inside of the car.

The central locking didn't work good.

Not all doors could be locked at all.

Engine sometimes died for no obvious reason, in the middle of the traffic.

Sometimes, you couldn't change gears.

Engine started to sound very bad, like it was going to explode at any given moment.

General Comments:

The Renault 19 16v is a true drivers car. It was not made for regular driving, like going from point A to point B following the speed limits, instead, it was made for aggressive driving on small, twisty roads, with the engine and the wheels screaming of pleasure.

Most things of this car just breathes racing, everything from the clutch to the precise steering let's you know about this cars sporty character.

The engine is a pearl when it comes to giving you smiles on your face all day long. It really feels just like a turbo coming in at 4000 RPM, just like people says, this is no joke, you have to try it yourself to believe it. Personly I don't think the engine is that sluggish under the 4000 RPM mark as some people say, it's just like your ordinary, everyday car at those revs - but when you hit the magic spot, you definitely know what kind of car you drive again, and the fun continues up to 7000 RPM!

The engine also sounds very good, and have a raw, big engine note that should please most drivers out there, especially if you let it breath a bit better.

The steering of this car is very precise, however, overall, I think it's a disappointment. Too light, and too much like something you would find in a computergame. It's precise, and pretty fast, but it just don't feel so good, and on regular, wide roads, driving in a straight line, the steering becomes nervous. Not fun at all.

The handling is this cars strongest mark. It always have an enormous amount of grip, and it always gives you the right amount of feedback of what's going on under the wheels, that you can make it go around small, twisy roads in serious amounts of speed.

To compare this car to other sporty cars that I've owned, I would say that the Renault 19 16v outhandles them all. My Alfa Romeo 75's that I've had are more fun to drive than the 16v, but when it comes to handling, the 16v wins. My Peugeot 205 CTi, (based on the GTi), is fun, better steering, but it just feels too nervous, especially the tail of the car, that comes out a bit too easily for my taste. The Renault 19 16v simply gives you the feeling of a more secury, faster ride than the Alfas and the 205 Cti.

The comfort of this car is pretty good, considering the lowered chassi of the 16v compared to the ordinary Renault 19. However, it truly is a sporty car, and the ride quality do suffers from this cars fantastic handling.

The seats are comfortable, very supportive, and looks ace.

The interior goes well with the outside of the car, and is actually quite solid for being a french car from the beginning of the 90's.

This is also a good car for serious audiosystems, since 6,5 inch speakers, no matter how deep they are, fits in perfectly in the doors in front of the car, and there are also room for tweeters or 4 inch speakers on the dashboard itself.

Fuel economy is pretty good, even when you drive the car the way it was meant to be driven. In average, from every 100 kilometers, the car wants just about 0,8 litres of gas, and it it's very hard to drive it in a way that you come over the 1.0 litre mark for 100 kilometers, even if you have a heavy foot on the gaspedel at most of the times.

However, the Renault 19 16v is a quite poorly built car, many minor problem, and unfortunately, even some major ones too. I'm not the only person out there who have experienced problems with the engine, far from it I'm afraid. The Renault 19 16v have to be taken good care of, and even if you do just that, it's absolutely not guaranteed that it will be rewarding to you.

It's a fast, sporty car, but it's not suitable for everyday driving, and you should be aware of the general quality of these cars before you buy one of these things. Buy it at your own risk.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th December, 2005

Average review marks: 6.5 / 10, based on 27 reviews