1993 SAAB 900 S review from North America
"It runs well, is a blast to drive, and turns heads!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Previous to my purchase, the following went wrong:
-Headliner Sagged (reupholstered)
-Headlight wiper broke (replaced)
-AC Failed
-Seat Heat Unit Failed
-Cruise-control failed.
Since purchase:
-Transmission Slippage/Failure (replaced)
-Power Doorlocks Fail Intermittently
-Fuel Rail Leak (Repaired)
-Oil Leak (Repaired)
-Leather Seats Wearing at Seams.
SAABs are often dubbed invincible. This is only true, because their owners love them. It's not uncommon for a SAAB to have a million miles on it, but ask the owner how much time and money has gone into its maintenance.
General comments?
You can see my car at http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2153509/1.
I love my 1993 SAAB 900 S. It's my first car, and I will certainly only replace it with another one like it.
I bought it used, and I opted for the naturally aspirated engine. All the turbos that I drove had been badly abused, so the NA engine was a good way to avoid heavy-footed previous ownership.
As you can see from the above link, I have modified mine quite a lot, but this review will focus on the pros and cons of the stock car.
PRO:
-Low purchase price (now)
-Quirky, unique, and (some would say) pretty
-Satisfying and confidence-inspiring in turns
-UNSTOPPABLE in all weather conditions
-Dependable (for the most part)
-VERY safe, especially for the time it was built
-Comfortable and intuitive cabin and instruments
-Leather interior can hold up very well with care
-ENORMOUS cargo-space 21cu.ft./58cu.ft, seats down
-Oil is never dirty
-None of the maintenance concerns of a turbo.
CON:
-Engine requires careful maintenance
-Some features work, but are temperamental:
=Power door locks
=Heated seats
-Parts/upgrades take dedication to find
-Sluggish acceleration in the cold
-Not the turbo model.
I find the SAAB 900 S is the perfect car for the American who likes to stand out with subtlety. It is not a loud, wild car. Rather, it is an understated, well-built work horse.
There is plenty of room for modification. The stock intake and exhaust are fairly restrictive, and the suspension is a bit on the soft side.
Overall, though, I would buy the same car, if I had it to do over again. I would recommend it for both first time car owners and Swede speed enthusiasts.
Recommended reviews
| Unique but very reliable |
| OK, but not great - avoid the automatic 4D sedans! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1993 |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.1L DOHC 16v Inline-4 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 120000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 165000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 21st April, 2006 |