1989 SAAB 9000 Reviews - Page 2 of 4

1989 SAAB 9000 Turbo 2.0 turbo from North America

Model year1989
Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 2.0 turbo Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.5 / 10
Distance when acquired178000 miles
Most recent distance179000 miles

Summary:

Wish it was American so I could understand whats going on inside.. (electrically nightmarish)

Faults:

Battery doesn't hold charge well.

Power leak most likely.

Doesn't always like to go into reverse.

Power window motor broke.

Electrical nightmare...

Fuel gauge jumps. It will read what is actually in the tank for about two seconds then jump to empty for about two seconds.. Then back to actual reading.

Rear hatch MUST be opened from the inside of the car.

General Comments:

Car is pretty quick, only because of the turbo.

Cabin does feel fairly spacious.

Runs pretty smooth for an old car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 30th September, 2005

1989 SAAB 9000 S from North America

Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.3 / 10
Distance when acquired194600 miles
Most recent distance230400 miles
Previous carMercury Tracer

Summary:

Among the best luxury cars in the 80's

Faults:

Belt tensioner broke at 196,000 miles.

Voltage meter on the dash faded until gone.

Power windows and sunroof buttons no longer stay lit.

Headlights go out at worst possible time.

Rear lift gate does not open.

General Comments:

This car with all of it's minor flaws is very reliable.

It has never died on me without giving warning first.

The most comfortable car I have ever driven on long distances.

The roomiest interior ever.

This Saab handles rather well for a car with over 200k on the clock.

Very, very slow. At least 20 seconds to reach average highway speeds.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th June, 2004

1989 SAAB 9000 Turbo Automatic from Australia and New Zealand

Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership1994
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission Automatic Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 2 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 2 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 0 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.8 / 10
Distance when acquired80000 kilometres
Most recent distance120000 kilometres
Previous carToyota Corona

Summary:

Money Pit

Faults:

Engine mounts seem to go every 12 months.

Coil for the turbo went after 100,000 km.

Thermostat needed to be replaced.

Power steering master cylinder leaked onto alternator and took it out. Both had to be replaced.

Harmonic balancer wore out. I didn't even know they had to ever be replaced.

Muffler is in three sections. Sections two and three tend to rust if you don't drive the car lots. We couldn't drive the car lots - it wasn't reliable enough to clock up big mileage.

Air conditioning pump seized. Engine needed to be taken out for this to be fixed.

Electronic turbo boost control was designed wrong. Replaced with older designed mechanical boost control. Worked fine ever since.

Rear brake calipers started to leak. Needed both rear brakes to be overhauled.

Coolant from the auto transmission was leaking into the main cooling jacket contaminating the coolant. We were very lucky that no coolant entered the gearbox. It would have had to have been replaced. In the 9000, the coolant for the engine also cools the auto gearbox. The gearbox also has a separate oil cooler.

Electric aerial broke (twice).

Central locking doesn't work.

Alarm doesn't work properly.

Drivers side electric window doesn't work.

Interior trim is falling apart.

Shock absorbers need to be replaced.

General Comments:

The most comfortable car I have ever driven. More comfortable than the Mercedes.

This car is a money pit. There is always something going wrong. My car has been in a couple of big accidents, but even my friends with cars with perfect history have the same problem's.

It is hard to find mechanics to fix these cars. In Melbourne there are only two non-factory specialists. The service we received from the dealership was very disappointing. I had to take the car back many times to get things fixed.

The electronics in this car are seriously complex. There are over 50 fuses!

Parts are not too expensive. Labor costs are horrendous. Almost everything seems to require the engine being removed.

I love the fact it is a 5 door lift back. It is very practical. I wish more car makers would make big cars like this.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 4th May, 2004

8th May 2004, 23:40

It is unfortunate you have had so many problems with your vehicle. I think you are being a bit harsh on the car.

Remember, you purchased a car is sometimes classified as a semi-exotic and it is 15 years old. A few comments.

-Why do you say the electronic boost control was designed wrong? It is was the first system of the sort and is considered one of the most innovative and practical systems ever. They rarely ever fail.

-What do you mean by coil for the turbo?

-If the engine mounts were installed properly then they should not have to be changed for 10 years.

-You may be confused about the power steering, there is no master cylinder. I think you are referring to the pump.

In any case, I've owned and/or have worked on many 9000's, and they are a complicated car. Honda's don't seem to break as often... because they have a lot less stuff to break. The 9000 came with major advancements of the day which included climate control, electronic boost control, heated seats... and so on, so just realize that with all these gadgets are going come with more issues. The engine is known to go well over 300,000 miles is taken care of.

Again, sorry to hear about your situation!

27th Jun 2004, 21:48

Until about 1996 I think, the combination of the turbocharged engine and the automatic transmission was best avoided. The transmission just wasn't rated for the sudden, powerful boost of the turbo. I believe the autobox was rated for a maximum of about 190 lbs/ft of torque, which the 2.3 turbo could exceed, with a lead-footed driver. However, since your car is a 1989 model, it most likely had the 2.0 engine. The earlier autos and turbos (when they get old) tend to develop problems. A combination of age and complex electronics (for the performance control in the turbo engines) makes these cars somewhat crotchety in their old age. Just like some people!

Better luck with your new car...

Average review marks: 6.9 / 10, based on 15 reviews