1999 Subaru Outback 2.5 from North America

Summary:

Wonderful AWD Car

Faults:

Had wet weather problems with a sensor 2 years ago. Once it dried out the problem went away.

General Comments:

Without either Yokohama Ice Guard or Bridgestone Blizzak Winterbiter, my 1999 Subaru Outback did poorly in snow and ice here in the Colorado Rockies. But once I installed the Blizzak or Yokohama clones of Blizzak tires, the car did fantastic in snow and ice. In fact unless the snow is 8 inches or more deep my Blizzak equipped Outback is better in snow than my 4WD Jeep Cherokee.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 27th December, 2004

9th Feb 2005, 10:45

I have had great luck with Nokian Hakkapeliitta's both model 10 and Q. They are Finnish tires and wonderful in here in the UP of Michigan where we get over 200 inches of snow annually. A bit hard to find and priced the same as other winter tires, but I feel they are worth every penny….the Finns really know how to make things!!!

1999 Subaru Outback Limited 2.5L from North America

Summary:

Excellent road handling with All Wheel Drive system in snow and ice, but substandard value overall

Faults:

All 4 tires (Firestone) have been slowly leaking air for 2 years. After several complaints to dealer, they diagnosed the tires as having "dry rot" cracks and should be replaced. Cost over $400, since tires are now out of warranty.

Car has had small oil leaks for past year. Dealer just diagnosed as 3 separate oil leaks, 2 on engine block seals and one on valve cover gasket. Cost was over $800 to repair by replacing gaskets. Dealer noted no distortion at gasket seating surface on this aluminum block engine.

When I pursued dealer on whether these issues were unusual, they first said no, but refused to research any company database. Two salesmen hung on me. Finally the service manager agreed to research and I am currently awaiting her explanation.

General Comments:

Excellent driving control in snow, important for Northeast US.

Sunroof opens over rear seat only, somewhat useless for the driver.

Fixed non-opening sunroof over front seat merely adds heat to interior.

Cup holder is in front of stereo, and must be stowed when changing a CD, requiring placing the cup elsewhere temporarily. This can make changing the CD somewhat dangerous while driving.

Dealer offered rental car when we had to leave car overnight for service (oil leak repair), but we had to go to Enterprise for the car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 16th July, 2004

4th Mar 2005, 21:52

Subaru's having oil leaks via the valve cover gaskets, and also through the front seals is very common. You were charged a great deal to have those repairs done. Even so, these leaks are almost endemic to the Subaru's, usually reappearing after 2 years...

1st Nov 2005, 13:57

I also understand oil leaks to be very common amongst 'flat' engines. Make sure you use a non synthetic oil. Full synthetic oils such as 'Mobil 1' are actually too fine, and will exacerbate the leaking issues.

1999 Subaru Outback 30 year Limited Edition 2.5L DOC from North America

Summary:

An extreme maintenance disappointment

Faults:

Transmission died at 68K Miles.

Blown head gasket/complete engine rebuild at 99K miles.

General Comments:

Good looking car.

One of the few that provides all wheel drive for winter, yet handles like a car, not a truck.

Ergonomically a disaster. Terrible layout of controls, no lighting of window/door locks, etc.

Subaru quality seems to be a myth. Head gasket problems are inherent with this engine. Spent $5k for engine rebuild at 99K miles.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 27th May, 2004

1999 Subaru Outback Limited 4 cylinder from North America

Summary:

Practical in winter, but high maintenance/high-cost

Faults:

Oxygen sensor (s) replaced 3 times, once under recall, twice when engine idled rough and subsequently (weeks later) "check engine" light came on. Dealer could not identify problem until this light came on.

Brake rotors needing replacement every 30,000 miles.

Transmission had to be replaced at 50,000 miles for slipping.

General Comments:

High maintenance/high cost-of-maintenance car.

Great in snow.

Handles well, but slow acceleration.

Very poor, "mushy", brakes that require strong effort.

Dealer (s) generally not helpful in getting chronic maintenance problems resolved.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 30th January, 2004

1st Sep 2004, 15:51

Front rotors had to be replaced at 49,000 miles. Now at 90,000, the Subaru dealer's repair technician tells me that the front rotors need to be replaced again. I am not a happy Subaru owner.

29th Jan 2007, 13:14

I had a Chevy Cavalier that needed rotors every 12,500 miles, so don't feel bad!