"Unpredictable gas pedal."
Drive-By-Wire is the cause. Most manufacturers vehicles have this feature now. Here's an article on the subject:
ORIGINAL REVIEWER HERE.
I don't think the pedal is because of drive-by-wire, because I have had technicians drive it and they say it feels funny. It only happens intermittently.
In my original post, I had not measured the highway gas mileage. The verdict is in - at 55 MPH, I see 26 MPG in the winter. Not what I had hoped for. I drive like a Grandma, and for a supposedly fuel-efficient car, the Camry sorely, sorely disappoints.
Mileage is roughly 69,926.
Your only getting 26 MPG is very suspicious. I don't buy the "I drive like a grandma." I easily get a constant 30-31 MPG, and sometimes upwards of 36 MPG. If you consistently drive in the city, then of course that number would drop.
On February 8, 2011, the NHTSA, in collaboration with NASA, released its findings into the investigation on the Toyota drive-by-wire throttle system. After a 10 month search, NASA and NHTSA scientists found no electronic defect in Toyota vehicles. (28) DRIVER ERROR or pedal misapplication was found responsible for most of the incidents.
I am the original poster. The Camry is now up to 74,000 miles.
Since my last post, the passenger's right air vent became funny. When you set the heat (or A/C) to the floor only, the vent still blows air (none of the other vents do this; I just have my passengers close the vent. More of an annoyance than a problem).
Fuel mileage remains unchanged.
The brakes are making continuous grinding noises, and I will have them checked at my next service appointment.
ORIGINAL AUTHOR HERE.
The Camry is up to 80,220 miles. The check engine light came on, so I took the car to Toyota. They replaced the O2 sensor. Everything else remains unchanged.
I recently was a passenger in a late model Camry for a (thankfully) short trip. A very, very scary car to ride in when you're used to G.M.s.
Yes, so "scary" that according to this site, 73% of Camry owners would buy another Toyota & only 17% wouldn't.
Before you start questioning my math, I'm sure that other 10% are undecided or "don't know" as they say here.
We had no problem clearly identifying being part of the 17 percent. What happens a lot is someone has had good luck for a decade in the 90s. They think the newest one after 2000 is a fluke and buy again. We thought we simply had bad luck or a lemon after a decade. So you give it one more try. Some people give it 2! That's what prior reliability mindsets can do... so you give it another chance. I suspect the issues are higher than any 17 percent. It's the repeat buyer mindset at play. We felt like fools.
Look at the percentage of the 2006 Camry.
None of my friends have good luck with any Toyota. I don't understand the appeal of these boring and ugly vehicles.
According to this site, only 30% of 2010 Camry owners would buy another. The other 70% probably felt the same way I did.
But I would feel much worse if I paid 30,000 for one of these rolling piles of garbage.
I stand corrected, that is a pathetic satisfaction rate, as is the 2010 as another comment pointed out.
All of the Camrys I've ever rented were earlier models - early to mid 2000s, & we never had any issues with any of them. We found them a bit boring, a bit appliance-like. But every one was comfortable and appeared well built. We never confused them with fun to drive sporty cars though. ;)
My first Toyota was a mid 1970's model that was boring, but very well built and easy to drive. My time spent in a newer Camry, was like not the same manufacturer. Squeaks and rattles galore, a trans that shifts constantly for no reason, and a throttle that has to think about it before reacting.
Comparison between 1970's and late model reviews confirms the accuracy of this informative and entertaining site.
Keep up the good work Car Survey.
Add another comment
Note: A Comments RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site
Copyright 1997 - 2013 CSDO Media Limited Advertise on this site