2006 Vauxhall Astra Reviews - Page 2 of 3

2006 Vauxhall Astra VXR 2.0 petrol turbo from UK and Ireland

Model year2006
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 2.0 petrol turbo Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired6 miles
Most recent distance3800 miles
Previous carPorsche 944

Summary:

Rapid and good looking hot hatch

Faults:

Heater control unit for the air conditioning failed at ten months old.

Drivers side air vent broke in the closed position.

Offside rear tyre went pop at 2700 miles (not really a fault with the car though) and new tyre cost £178 fitted... ouch.

Car was poorly prepared by dealer for pick up by me (it was brand new) with various scuffs on the interior.

General Comments:

Like some of the other reviewers on this site, I test drove the Focus ST, Golf GTI, Golf R32, Octavia vRS, Impreza STI, BMW M3 and a used (three year old) 911 C2 before choosing the VXR. I chose it because it is simply the most rewarding and exciting car to drive out of the bunch. Yes it can be a wee bit unruly when you are pressing on, but the torque steer is really very minor, and hardly noticeable when you are concentrating. Unlike some media types, I tend to be gripping the steering wheel when driving hard, so perhaps this is why my car does not pull to the left?

It compares well with the Focus ST, which is a bit sedate and middle aged for me (but still a good car) whilst the Golf R32 is nose heavy and feels like a diesel to drive, and the Golf GTI is really, really slow, and feels like an ordinary family hatchback. The Impreza STI was a great drive, but I could not live with the image, whilst the Octavia vRS handles like a big slow barge.

The two more expensive cars, the BMW M3 and the used 911, were both very comfortable, fairly quick and good fun. The BMW is really nice inside and seems well built, but I was really surprised at the lack of pace; it was nothing like as quick as the performance figures would have you believe. The 911 is fairly quick, but pretty expensive (even a used one), and the tiny rear seats ruled it out for me, no matter how much I tried to kid myself on that I could live with it.

I have now had the VXR for over a year, and still think I made a reasoned choice. It is very easy to drive around town (in non sport mode), has surprising interior space for four people, and it really moves when out on quieter roads in the countryside.

Another reviewer stated that his VXR could be forced to under steer, and it is true that most powerful front wheel drive cars can be pushed into this, but it is not a problem I have had. It handles pretty well, corners in a flat and rapid manner, and only seems to get out of shape when the road is a bit too wet, or there are plenty of road repair marks for the wheels to tram line over.

It cannot be overstated just how blisteringly quick this car is when you thrash it; you really have to try one to see if you like the sensation (the noise from the standard exhaust and turbo charger is superb inside the car, but can become a bit wearing on sensitive ears). This is not a car for drivers who are not really very good at driving; the BMW or Golf is probably your best bet. The experience is brutal (but very enjoyable), however, if I had to drive every day (and I usually stick to two wheels so I do not have to), I could see how it could begin to lose its appeal.

The interior quality of the car is average, but the car is a good looking beast from the outside; it really is all about the driving experience (not the "ownership" experience) with this car.

Vauxhall dealers seem to get a bad review in the press and on forums, and in my experience they really deserve it. Once you have paid your cash, you become a nuisance who will be fobbed off if at all possible, or kept waiting for days for simple tasks to be carried out. Bear this in mind if you fancy trying a VXR, as this can detract from your enjoyment of the car.

The running costs are not too bad. I am old enough that insurance is not a real problem for me (£331 FC), and the mileage attainable is surprising for such a powerful machine; around 18 mpg when "making progress" to around 38 mpg on a long journey.

I hope this review will give you some ideas as to why some people like the VXR so much, but, if you can, you should do what I did and take long tests in all of the contenders to see what works for you.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 5th September, 2007

2nd Jan 2008, 21:00

I have one and your review sums it up correct, I got rid of a GTI for it!!

19th Jul 2009, 03:38

Choosing an Astra VXR over a BMW M3?? That's your choice, but the M3 seems slow, no way. Surely they are faster than a VXR.

21st Jan 2010, 05:26

BMW M3 348bhp, Astra VXR 238bhp, make your own mind up.

22nd Jan 2010, 02:25

I've got a E46 M3, and believe me, no VXR is even coming close, 0-60 in 5 seconds compared to 6 seconds for the Astra; that's if it can get traction. The M3 is the closest thing to a super car.

1st May 2010, 14:05

Why would you drive an M3, then go with the Astra VXR?

19th Jan 2011, 05:52

I suspect the price differential may have had something to do with it (VXR over M3).

Slightly put off that you would recommend it only to good drivers - my skill is probably only average.

(Are good drivers the ones with their front fog lights switched on?).

2006 Vauxhall Astra SRi 1.9 CDTi from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 1.9 CDTi Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance16000 miles
Previous carFord Mondeo

Summary:

Disappointing!

Faults:

New drive shaft required.

New CV joint required.

New CIM module required.

New ECU required (still waiting for this...)

General Comments:

Frankly, a disappointing car.

The good points are that it looks great, goes well and does 40mpg. It handles well, and despite the sports suspension (mine has the IDS+ fitted) the ride isn't too bad either.

However, the build quality is appalling. Aside from the problems listed above, it has also got leaking back lights (they mist up, no fix for this), various rattles from the car inside, and also the drivers window rattles when half way down. Again there is no fix for this, so I had to do a DIY job on it, as it was driving me crazy.

Generally speaking, the dealers aren't very good, although I've found one that seems to know what they are doing.

I had planned to keep this car for a few years, but I don't trust it anymore, and suspect that there will be some very expensive faults when it's out of the warranty period, so it'll have to go. Next time I'll stick with Ford!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 16th July, 2007

29th Aug 2007, 06:23

Try putting some silica gel inside your light fitting to absorb the moisture.

Average review marks: 7.7 / 10, based on 9 reviews