1994 Ford Taurus LX review from North America
"A good car with a bad transmission"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Brakes.
Rotors.
Ignition switch.
Radiator.
General comments?
A good car with a terrible transmission. The 3.0 engine is bulletproof but the transmission feels like it is made of plastic, it is very clunky. I am just waiting for it to go.
Another factor is that these cars are dirt cheap when compared to GM products that don't seem to be much better.
Recommended Reviews:
  | V-6 performance in the guise of a family car |
| 1993 - Taurus SHO 3.2 liter Yamaha It is a Corvette, Lexus and BMW mixed together pretending to be a Taurus |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1998 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 6/10 |
| Reliability marks | 6/10 |
| Comfort marks | 6/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 130000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 144000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Monte Carlo |
| Date of Entry | 14th January, 2001 |