1992 Ford Taurus L review from North America
What things have gone wrong with the car?
A. Rear and front brakes replaced twice.
B. Rotors and drums replaced, cost $900 for A + B.
C. Headlights are difficult to adjust.
General comments?
Good design, poor and cheap materials used for brakes.
Recommended Reviews:
  | 1992 - Taurus Wagon GL 3.0 Liter V6 A car for ones who likes to tinker around |
| A definate bagain for my uses, and hope it helps you out too! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0l v6 |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 5/10 |
| Comfort marks | 9/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5/10 |
| Date of Entry | 16th June, 1998 |