2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT review from North America
"Good performance, poor engineering"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
A loose hose clamp caused a coolant leak, but it did not leave me stranded.
General comments?
The engine is strong and provides good acceleration and shifting is nearly effortless (except in cold weather).
The interior feels cheaply made, the dash rattles, the glove-box squeaks, the rear deck-lid vibrates... Nothing really broken, but all of the little noises do get annoying on long drives.
Visibility is simply horrible. The pillars are large and in just the wrong places.. The spoiler blocks half of your already tiny rear-viewing area, backing up is not fun in crowded parking lots.
The steering felt loose at high speeds, road feedback was minimal. The car doesn't have the precision steering I have become used to from my Hondas.
Also, the turning radius is huge, it feels like you're trying to park a Buick.
Despite the loose handling on the highway, the car corners on a dime. The wheels simply won't let go of the road.
If you are shopping for a sports coupe, test drive a Celica or RSX before deciding on an Eclipse. They perform well, but they feel like they were slapped together from random parts.
Recommended Reviews:
![]() ![]() | 2000 - Eclipse Spyder RS 2.1 Inline-4 Right priced sports car with lots of features |
![]() ![]() | Incredible Speed, Import Pride |
All 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 V6 Manual |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 8/10 |
| Comfort marks | 6/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 14000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 30000 miles |
| Previous car | Honda Accord |
| Date of Entry | 3rd June, 2002 |

