1993 Chevrolet Blazer Reviews - Page 5 of 5

1993 Chevrolet Blazer Tahoe 4.3 Vortec from North America

Year of manufacture1993
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2001
Engine and transmission 4.3 Vortec Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired115000 miles
Most recent distance140025 miles
Previous carChevrolet C10

Summary:

Decent, but not the best

Faults:

Radiator started leaking and had to be replaced (plastic/aluminum radiators are a pain since they cannot be repaired).

Front brake rotors warped and had to be replaced.

Starter motor died and had to be replaced twice.

Air conditioning system needed complete rebuild (done by dealer, thank God).

Power steering pump needed replacement due to leak.

Interior components (arm rest, center console door) fell apart, and had to be replaced.

Upper ball joints replaced.

Rear brake shoes replaced.

All shocks replaced.

General Comments:

I acquired this vehicle used after my wife rolled our previous S-10 Blazer. We liked the powerful Vortec V-6, the looks, and the space of the vehicle.

After having driven it for a while, I am not entirely pleased. It has a terrible, jittery, punishing ride that is hard to tame. I've balanced the wheels, changed to better shocks, and rotated tires to try and get rid of the vibration, but only partially succeeded. Evidently, springs are too stiff to provide a comfortable ride. I will go down a size in tires when the present tires wear out. Another common Blazer headache is the weak brakes. The front rotors on my previous Blazer constantly needed resurfacing to take out the warping. I've installed Raybestos rotors, but these aren't anything super hot, so not sure if this will cure the problem. In my opinion, it's a design flaw: brake rotors are not big enough to take the heat of stopping this heavy rig.

The motor pulls well, but the weight of the vehicle can be felt on steep hills, where downshifting is necessary. The A/C has developed a glitch of shutting off while coasting. If you romp on the gas, it kicks back in. Weird... It has a lot of annoying little rattles, but the body is basically sound. Despite the age of the vehicle, interior materials and exterior paint look very good, and when polished and cleaned up, it's still a sharp looking machine.

All in all, a mixed bag of good and bad. If you want a solid, flawless vehicle, this is probably not it. For those mechanically inclined, these are decent vehicles, but they take attention to keep them going.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th July, 2001

20th Sep 2002, 12:24

Is the reviewer reviewing the full-size Blazer or S10 Blazer? The only problems I've had with my 94 S10 Blazer is a fuel pump that quit ($500 Canadian) and a clogged EGR valve ($50 Cdn). Just curious if I'm going to run into the same problems as the reviewer. I suspect he's talking about the Full-size because he refers to the vehicle as being a "heavy rig". The little S10 Blazer doesn't strike me as a heavy rig.

Mark.

Average review marks: 7.0 / 10, based on 16 reviews