1995 Chevrolet Camaro Reviews

1995 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7L V-8 from North America

Model year1995
Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 5.7L V-8 Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.8 / 10
Distance when acquired72119 miles
Most recent distance136802 miles
Previous carToyota Celica

Summary:

A lesson in the cost of an older, fast car, however exhilarating

Faults:

Between when I got the car in April 2008 and when I stopped driving it in 2011 (it sits in my driveway as a slowly fix it - blown head gasket), I've had to replace:

Driver's and passenger's door window motors (80k and 120k miles, respectively, approximately).

The HVAC blower motor (76k).

Oil pressure sensor (gauge constantly read very low, ~80k).

Engine got a pronounced tick, turned out to be a bad lifter (part of the valve train, ~125k).

The headliner was sagging when I got the car, but it wasn't that expensive to fix.

Rusty catalytic converter, the exhaust pipe broke off behind it, replaced it and reattached the pipe (maybe 78k).

The head gasket blew (passenger side, I think) at about 136k, rendering it basically un-driveable. I blame my youthful self.

Tune-ups cost about $1400 on this car; not a good thing.

Finally, I went through four clutches in three years - granted the first one may have had many miles on it and been abused, one of them was defective, and this was the car I learned heel-and-toeing on, but they're about $1000 apiece to replace, and the car makes 325 lb-ft of torque.

Speaking of things that might have been partially my fault, I'm pretty sure I'd have saved that head gasket if I spent a little less time over 5000 RPM in the thing. I mean, it was fun :)

General Comments:

This car is seriously quick and handles like it's on rails.

Really, when it works, it's quicker than a 350Z and anything FWD, and it stayed with a Lancer Evo from a rolling start. The fact that I know these things might have something to do with how it's now in my driveway in the middle of a slow-going head gasket repair job.

Handling is phenomenal; I'm sure it'd be humbled by a Cayman S or a Corvette, but with the SLP suspension upgrade I gave it, it turns-in without delay, and really holds on in corners - understeer is there eventually, but the gas pedal fixes that. Body roll is present, but never a hindrance. Left-right-left transitions are well controlled and great fun. Unfortunately I don't remember how it drove before the SLP things, that wasn't long after I got the car.

Braking is the car's main dynamic weakness. They tend to fade pretty early on, and regardless, the pedal isn't the best. Kinda squishy. (but nowhere near as bad as the TrailBlazer I used to drive.)

The sound of the engine is one of the reasons to have and drive a sporty car, and the LT1 V-8's is one of the best. Which is probably another reason the thing broke on me.

The cockpit is pretty dour compared to most things, with lots of hard plastic. But every control and gauge is easy to find and use, and the shifter and clutch have good feel. Anyhow, I'm of the persuasion that sportiness has no need for luxury, and I think the Camaro agrees with me (but there's still a power driver's seat!).

Overall a fast, agile car that could use a brake upgrade and an engine rebuild (thanks to me). And a reminder of: Fast, Affordable, Reliable. Pick two! :)

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 29th May, 2013

30th May 2013, 17:00

How in the world could a tune-up on an old Camaro cost $1400?

Your mechanic must really miss seeing you drive up.

1995 Chevrolet Camaro Base 3.4L sfi from North America

Model year1995
Year of manufacture1995
First year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission 3.4L sfi Automatic
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.2 / 10
Distance when acquired148000 miles
Most recent distance150000 miles

Summary:

I love my Camaro!!

Faults:

I don't know if I just found a lemon or what, but I have always wanted a Camaro and this is my first one, and I think I have replaced almost everything.

- EGR

- Rear main seal

- Rear freeze plugs

- Map sensor

- O2 sensors

- Air idle control valve

- Throttle position sensor

- Oil pressure sensor

- Rebuilt transmission!!!

- New brain

- Drive shaft

There are a few other things that I have replaced since I bought this car less than 3 weeks ago, just can't remember them off top of my head.

General Comments:

I absolutely love my car. It just bothers me how much crap I have had to do when the guy I bought it from was telling me all it needed was a fresh tank of gas.

I wouldn't trade it for anything!!! My mom has a Mustang and that thing is definitely not faster than the Camaro!!!

The Mustang is an 08 V6!!! But this is a great car if you have the time and money to make it run right!!! Just add a cold air intake and a few performance parts here and there and she won't let you down!!! <3333.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 1st November, 2009

2nd Nov 2009, 12:43

Add anything you want to your V6 Camaro. It will never be a Z28!!! You will lose every single red light/stop sign race! You can't do much with 180HP. Even though a 2008 Mustang V6 has only 180HP as well, it is much lighter and will be faster than your V6 Camaro.

28th Mar 2013, 15:18

I know that comment was years ago, but I can't help but set the record straight for you here. The 95 Camaro's 3.4L V-6 made 160 HP, and the 08 Mustang's V-6 made 210. Also, a 2008 Mustang weighs more than a 1995 Camaro. Finally, modifications can outweigh any disadvantages any car may have had at manufacture; a jog through YouTube can show you many fast V-6 Mustangs and Camaros.

Average review marks: 7.0 / 10, based on 24 reviews