1996 Ford Escort Reviews - Page 11 of 15

1996 Ford Escort LX 1.9 from North America

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 1.9 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired75000 miles
Most recent distance144000 miles
Previous carFord Escort

Summary:

A cheap reliable

Faults:

The timing belt broke around 88,000mi.

The front bearings went bad around 88,000mi as well.

Around 120,000mi the O-2 sensors and ignition coil went bad.

General Comments:

This is a really great student car.

It is very reliable.

Exterior and interior are still in good condition.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th March, 2004

1996 Ford Escort RS2000 2 Litre petrol from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership1996
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 2 Litre petrol Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired55 miles
Most recent distance58 miles
Previous carFord Escort

Summary:

A reliable quick road rocket!

Faults:

Worn front lower wishbones.

New battery, as previous had come to the end of its life.

New front brake discs and pads due to excessive wear.

General Comments:

Very quick for a naturally aspirated engine.

Handles very taught and confident.

Interior is typically classy with recaro seats and swooping dash..

This production year, yields more refinements that previous incarnations.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 20th December, 2003

1996 Ford Escort LX from North America

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission Don't Know
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 5 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 1 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.2 / 10
Distance when acquired97000 miles
Most recent distance163000 miles

Summary:

A nightmare on wheels

Faults:

The car did not come with any hazard lights.

The alignment of the car will not stay fixed.

Rear window defroster is slow to react.

Trunk does not open easily, and there is no lever to pop the trunk.

The speedometer would wave wildly at speeds above 45mph.

The "Check Engine" and "Check Coolant" lights are always on.

The seat belt stuck on driver's side.

When idle and applying the brakes, the car rattles and vibrates.

Gas Gauger would waver like the speedometer.

General Comments:

The car was adequate as a first vehicle for new drivers.

The car handles well in city or highway traffic. However, it has trouble going up hills.

The car was very economical in regards to gas mileage.

The interior of the car was very comfortable for a two door.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th October, 2003

27th Sep 2007, 23:49

Wow I really don't think you know what you are talking about... it didn't come with hazard lights? what sort of in bred monkey did you buy it from?

1996 Ford Escort LX 1.9 SOHC from North America

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.9 SOHC Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 4 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.6 / 10
Distance when acquired106500 miles
Most recent distance108250 miles
Previous carChevrolet Corsica

Summary:

A small sporty box

Faults:

First, I had a clutch put in it.

Second, My timing belt snapped.

Then, The air conditioner hoses blew off.

Recently, I had another clutch put in it because my brother drove it and burnt the clutch clear to the rivets.

Along with that, the flywheel was shot.

General Comments:

Good gas mileage.

Car is quick and handles nice, but could be more stable in the turns. The car caould take bump a lot easier also.

Great interior. Maybe 3-4 burn holes.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th August, 2003

1996 Ford Escort LX from North America

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership1996
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance71000 miles
Previous carChevrolet Beretta

Summary:

A very reliable car for the mony

Faults:

Mostly normal maintnence.

General Comments:

Very reliable and a very good overall car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th June, 2003

1996 Ford Escort Mexico 1.6 from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.6 Manual
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired34000 miles
Most recent distance76000 miles
Previous carRover - Austin 200

Summary:

A good reliable all rounder

Faults:

Alarm

Ball joint.

General Comments:

A good all round mile eater which wasn't caused me any major problems.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 6th May, 2003

1996 Ford Escort Cabaret 1.8TD from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.8TD Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.8 / 10
Distance when acquired87000 miles
Most recent distance103000 miles
Previous carRover - Austin 100

Summary:

Cheap and a good performer

Faults:

Driver's side electric window has stopped working.

No other faults :-)

General Comments:

For a diesel car it is no slouch and rarely sluggish, and it also holds its own against petrol cars I've driven for my company. Acceleration right through the gears is very good, and cruising at 50mph in 5th and then slightly giving the engine some juice brings a reassuring whistle from the turbo and a nice increase in speed. Very cheap runner, easily around the 45-50 mpg for me and I'm hardly a slow driver.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 22nd February, 2003

1996 Ford Escort Serenade 1.6 16v petrol from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.6 16v petrol Manual
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired22000 miles
Most recent distance37000 miles
Previous carFord Escort

Summary:

A reliable rot box, built in Halewood with care by the same people who build the Jaguar X400

Faults:

Rear wheel-arches on both sides are rusting from the inside outward (all the spot welds in the wheel-arch flange are expanding as they rust away!)

Virtually all of the elements in the heated front screen are no longer work.

Nothing has hone wrong mechanically!

General Comments:

Car was a one owner, known history vehicle before being acquired from our in-laws. Always garaged, always serviced, never been in an accident. (Replaced a 1990 Escort cabriolet we'd had from new, that had 65,000 miles, with no rust). Holes appeared in the OS rear wheel-arch of the newer car some months before the 6 year corrosion warranty expired. That area was repaired by Ford dealer, but the underlying cause was not (bare metal joint between inner and outer whee-larch) ; the rest of that wheel arch and the near side one are now quite merrily rusting away. Ford have no interest. Built in Halewood with care, by the same people who now build the Jaguar X type?

Ludicrous instrument pack; who needs a line drawing of a car on an instrument pack (saves the cost of a tachometer presumably)

A cheap car to run, but check the wheel-arches very carefully before buying

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 30th January, 2003

26th May 2006, 14:21

I'm sorry, but that says nothing for JAGUAR!

Average review marks: 6.8 / 10, based on 58 reviews


Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews