1994 Ford Ranger XLT from North America - Comments

24th Oct 2008, 12:42

"Stay away from the 2.3!"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Rear spring hangers and shackles needed replaced.

Constant brake problems.

Blew a power steering line.

Had to change all the little lights behind the dash. Not a fun job.

Leaked fuel if you filled up.

Had to change spark plugs - the 2.3 is a 4cyl with eight plugs that are a pain to change - took all day.

A/C never worked right, compressor clutch made all sorts of noise.

General comments?

2.3 was sorely lacking in power in any gear. But, to its credit, it had 278k on it and didn't smoke.


26th Oct 2008, 06:01

Doesn't it just stink when a 14 year old truck does not perform like new. Maybe the showroom floor would have been a better place to buy your truck.


8th Nov 2008, 21:36

I've owned 3 of the 2.3 litre 4 cylinder Rangers, as well as 3 Ford cars that were powered by the 2.3 engine. True, the older ones weren't the fastest 4's around, but I never had a second's trouble with any of my 2.3 engines. The most miles I put on any of them was about 190,000, but it still ran very well. My last Ranger had the 8-plug setup and I changed the plugs in half an hour. All it requires is a universal swivel socket and long wrench.


17th Feb 2009, 01:43

Dude, you bought a truck with 276K miles, I think that pretty much says it all about the truck. Perhaps it was a gift, in which case you should not really complain.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Ford Ranger reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews