2000 Ford Ranger XLT review from North America
"It's fine, but I will consider another brand next time around"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
At 70,000 miles the head-gasket and transmission had to be replaced. I put absolutely no stress on this truck. I chalk it up to poor manufacturing.
General comments?
In general the truck has performed well, but costs are simply too high to keep it running.
Recommended reviews
| Overall, it's a very solid and reliable truck! |
| Good product, great price |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model year | 2000 |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 6cy 4.0L Automatic |
| Performance marks | 3 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 2 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 5 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 38000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 71000 miles |
| Previous car | Volkswagen GTI |
| Date of Entry | 5th June, 2005 |