1991 Ford Sierra XR4x4 2.9 EFi petrol from UK and Ireland

Summary:

One of the greatest all-rounders at any price

Faults:

Front TCA bushes at 76,000 miles. These failed again a year later, so fitted polyurethane "upgrade" items which have lasted ever since.

Clutch at 89,000 miles and again at 179,000 miles. As the car is used to tow a speedboat in the summer and is 4wd, I think this is reasonable.

Rocker cover gaskets and crankcase breather cleanout at 105,000 miles.

Shocks finished at 120k. Replaced with Koni gas adjustables all round which transformed the car.

Coolant temperature sensor failed at 150,000 miles, giving 8 mpg (gulp!) for a couple of weeks.

General Comments:

I bought this car as a 1900 mile ex-demonstrator from my local Ford dealer in late 1991. I have since put over 200,000 miles on it, and still use it to tow a speedboat all over the country, and it's as reliable as clockwork.

People praise VW and BMW etc for build quality, but after 200,000 miles of hard use, this car still looks, feels and drives superb. There's a bit of wear on the drivers seat squab, and the odd squeak over really rough roads, but its mechanically and cosmetically still superb. A real testament in my view.

The 4wd system has never gone wrong despite its complexity (even by today's standards), and less than impeccable reputation for reliability. I've had to replace two clutches, but in 216,000 miles, I don't think it's excessive. The fuel injection/management system has also been faultless apart from a coolant temperature sensor failure a couple of years back. This was diagnosed quickly and cheaply by a local fuel injection specialist. Other than that, and the few bits above, I've simply followed the Ford schedule to the letter, and it soldiers on happily.

In terms of what the car can do, the answer is pretty much anything. It tows effortlessly, can be slung around the back-lanes in lovely tail led four wheel drifts, sits at 80 mph on the motorway in near silence and sits in traffic and town all day without getting temperamental. Despite its advancing years it has electronic ABS, power steering, a heated windscreen, air conditioning, a CD multichanger, and electric everything. It's quick enough to blow away day to day traffic, engineered solidly enough to rack up 200,000 miles and still feel good. Added to all that, it seats five in comfort, has a big boot, fully folding seats and a big tailgate area for awkward loads, and although not an off-roader by any stretch, its 4WD system gives superb traction over fields, dirt tracks and snow. The lack of modern, reasonably affordable new cars that have or can do all that is the reason I still have it.

If you take fuel consumption (18 mpg) and its dated styling out of the equation, this car is still a fantastic all rounder even by today's standards. Think of any type of use you might put a car to, and an XR4x4 will cope admirably.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 4th March, 2005

5th Mar 2005, 16:10

Good review, pleasure to read.

Regards (from Poland)

23rd Mar 2005, 19:19

Very concise and helpful. I am considering purchasing one of these cars for import to Australia, therefore I have found the content of this review to be excellent. Regards Ron Brown

21st Nov 2005, 04:20

Four words: underpowered, overweight, ugly rustbucket.

5th Jun 2006, 08:44

Is that based on ownership or just prejudice?

Perhaps when you've done 200,000 miles in one like I have, your opinion might actually carry some weight.

I acknowledged it looks dated, but arguably less so than a Vauxhall, VW or even BMW of the same era.

It's not overweight. In fact, it's lighter than a fully loaded Focus, Astra, Megane, Golf or any other modern equivalent from the "class below"

Underpowered - maybe. But it's torquey, quick enough and its reliable. It will still comfortably wipe the floor with typical motorway flotsam encountered today. 0-60 in 8 seconds might not win any rallies, but it isn't exactly gutless. It will see off a current BMW 320i without going within 1,000 RPM of its redline.

Rustbucket - no. Only when owned by people who don't know how to look after a car.

Post some facts, not irrelevant opinions.

10th Jul 2006, 12:22

Actually rust is one of their weak points even when looked after well,its partly pot luck, but the higher end models often faired better.

My 92 model Ghia rear arches were fairly rusted by 2004.

1991 Ford Sierra sapphire Ghia 4x4 2.0i DOHC from UK and Ireland

Summary:

A little pocket rocket

Faults:

The center bearing on the prop had failed when I bought it,£15 from local scrappy, ford dealer wanted £380 for new prop due to "we do not do the bearing on its own"

Heated front screen only seems to work on the passenger side.

General Comments:

This car is very underrated, even though it has the 2.0 engine it still goes like a rocket although fuel consumption does tend to be nearer 20 mpg when thrashed

I bought the car for £40, spent £200 on it and am now going to replace the suspension with bilstein components to get the best out of it.

A pity ford stopped making it

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 9th November, 2004