2003 Honda Jazz Reviews - Page 2 of 3

2003 Honda Jazz 1.3 L CVT from Australia and New Zealand

Model year2003
Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.2 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance24000 kilometres
Previous carMazda 6

Summary:

What it lacks in power, it makes up for in style (and space)

Faults:

I suspect some loose screws behind the dash -- makes slight, but distinct rattling sounds when the car goes over rough-roads (and there are lots of these in Sydney).

Car also developed a *very* low, rhythmic rumble at speeds exceeding 105km/h. The 1.3L has to be pushed very hard to reach anything over 110km/h, but the rumble was apparent at over 100km/h.

Lights illuminating the gearbox blinked off when the car when over a road hump a tad faster than it should have (my fault). Tapping on the LEDs brings the light back (loose connection I guess).

General Comments:

One of the most economical production cars in the Western world that can carry 5 people in-style - and there is a lot of style in this little car. I used to own a Mazda-6, and this little thing still preserves some of my dignity ;).

Fuel savings are *the* most apparent thing with this 1.3L. Just remember to try and keep the A/C off most of the time (and yes - rolling down your power-windows will result in the 1.3L engine revving). Driven sensibly, fuel costs can be kept as low as 50% of a 6-cylinder.

I've had a BA Falcon before, and I have to say that this little car holds 5 people a little more comfortably. Feels like a People Mover - just a lot smaller. No super-massive driveshaft cutting the car in half.

It's definitely a wonderful "first car" for a young professional, or even a young family. Girls may like this more beacuse of the Jazz's very modern styling (as opposed to any "classic car" look a male might prefer).

The back seats can be completely removed, and it can carry a fair bit of luggage.

The "CVT" (1-speed-transmission) does need some pushing, so don't ever use this to race anything (except bicycles) on the road -- but it does the job, and keeps your wallet relatively happy.

A really good car to own in Sydney, if you want to keep costs low, but want to still drive in style.

Ideal for drivers who don't drag hard at the lights.

One point worth noticing is the *very* distinct understeer. It's accepted that understeer is safer than oversteer (meaning that you have to turn the wheel "more" to get the car pointed in any direction), and the Jazz requires quite a bit of handwork at mid to high speeds.

Test drive this car before buying (duh) and see if the understeer is acceptable. If you can live with that, and the 1.3L power, you have yourself a *huge* cost-saver.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th September, 2005

2003 Honda Jazz SE Sport 1.4 from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2003
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 1.4 Manual
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 1 / 10
Comfort marks 1 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
2.8 / 10
Distance when acquired15000 miles
Most recent distance15000 miles
Previous carFiat Punto

Summary:

Overhyped heap

Faults:

The back door is dropping on it's hinges.

The back "magic seat" has collapsed.

Air conditioning smells bad and does not cool the car.

Water comes through the hole for the aerial and makes the car damp.

The interior squeaks and rattles.

The panel gaps are uneven.

The paint is seriously bad quality.

It broke down at 7400 miles and when the AA came to my house he said dealing with Hondas is his bread and butter.

General Comments:

The fuel economy figures are all lies, if you want to keep up with traffic it easily drops to 32MPG.

It is uncomfortable, and really slow, on the motorway with anything near full load you will be lucky to get to 70MPH. A problem my Fiat never had. This is probably due to the miserable amount of torque it produces.

It is generally looking tired now with many stone chips and the thin metal easily picks up parking dents.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 12th July, 2004

16th Apr 2005, 15:05

So, what you're saying is, that the Jazz is not your taste of car, but the Fiat Punto is? I suggest that you look carefully at this site and all the smiley faces, then look at the fiat punto site and all the sad faces! I had a Punto, an it really was awful! Happily I now have a Jazz!

Average review marks: 7.6 / 10, based on 10 reviews