2010 Mazda 3 Reviews

2010 Mazda 3 i Sport 2.0 from North America

Model year2010
Year of manufacture2010
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2012
Engine and transmission 2.0 Automatic
Performance marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 1 / 10
Comfort marks 4 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 2 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
2.2 / 10
Distance when acquired15 kilometres
Most recent distance57000 kilometres
Previous carPontiac G6

Summary:

The car is "Rubbish"

Faults:

Rear shocks failed at 40000.

Brakes required replacement at 48000.

New center console fitted at 12000.

Fuel mileage is terrible... average 8.6 to 10.2 liters per 100 Kilometers.

Transmission clunks & miss-shifts.

Belts squeal - new belt fitted, no difference.

Timing chain rattles.

Electronic throttle positioner operates erratically at times.

The car rattles, & is not well fitted together.

General Comments:

This car is not an economical vehicle. It uses a tremendous amount of fuel for a small engine. The adverts for this model tend to indicate that the car will deliver good fuel economy... In truth, the car uses more fuel than most vehicles twice the size, & with larger engines.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 28th February, 2012

29th Feb 2012, 20:56

Wow! My 1989 Crown Victoria gets better gas mileage, and it's a huge, rear wheel drive, V8 land yacht, over 3000 pounds of steel.

Who would have thought?

Maybe there is something wrong with the car, like fuel injectors or something. I had a Mitsubishi 6 cylinder that burned more gas than a V-8 before; the engine was tired and worn out.

2010 Mazda 3 Sedan S 1.6 gas from Chile

Model year2010
Year of manufacture2010
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 1.6 gas Manual
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.2 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance23000 kilometres
Previous carOpel Astra

Summary:

Good, but expensive for the price

Faults:

Noise from the rear of the vehicle, especially with pavement imperfections. These sounds appeared at 18000 km, and progressively increased until I sold the car.

General Comments:

It is a good car, but not great as you might believe.

The engine of 1.6 is small, and somewhat old for the weight of the car. Overtaking is difficult, the car needs to accelerate hard to get momentum on the highway.

The car is especially stable on corners, and it is very easy to drive.

There are many parts of the car that are totally exposed; it was common to find new paint defects or scratches after a shopping day in the mall.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th December, 2011

2010 Mazda 3 MPS 2.3 turbo from Switzerland

Model year2010
Year of manufacture2010
First year of ownership2010
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 2.3 turbo Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired10 kilometres
Most recent distance20000 kilometres
Previous carSeat Toledo

Summary:

A new benchmark for turbo'd fun

Faults:

Absolutely nothing.

General Comments:

This car is a great all rounder.

It's fast, practical (5 doors with a good size boot) and reasonably economical when you want it to be.

The looks are subjective. After 1 year of ownership it still turns heads. I like the look of it. It's different and rare to see, so people look.

I get the full use of this car as it was intended, as I live within 5 minutes of the German autobahn, so I get fast fun out of it.

It's great to see much bigger and more expensive cars having to pull over to me at 230km/h, but at that speed this car can drink, but it's the smiles-per-mile that's important here.

Around town it's docile. I can get the book average economy of 9.5L/100km (29.6mpg).

Longer journeys above 20km I get around 7L/100km (40mpg).

Driving this car is exciting. I read reviews about how sudden the turbo is, but it's only a shock the first time you test drive it. I'm sure it's worse in some of the turbo'd super cars.

At 3000rpm the fun starts with the rush of 400Nm, and even at the top end of the speed curve in 6th gear, there is still pull all the way to the speed restrictor.

I'd love to know what the top speed would be without restriction.

Good points are that it's comfy, roomy, clear dashboard, good level of basic equipment. Groovy blue pedal, door and ceiling lighting, great build quality for the price, spacious enough for a 6 footer like me.

Technical details like chain cam engine and hydraulic clutch appeal as servicing costs can be expensive for such cars, but it means there will be no 1000 Euro bill for a cambelt service here, or clutch cable to snap like 99% of other cars on the road these days.

The price is a killer (low) in comparison to the rest of the market for what you get.

Bad points are that the clutch is a nightmare to get used to, there's really no room for errors here. You either go or stall it, but practice makes perfect. I don't know if this is inherent to the model or just mine.

The rear spoiler is a bit flaky. Mine rattles a bit with slow bumpy roads now, but it's nothing major.

The electric windows are not amazing. They work, but they're not exactly the best I've ever used, especially after only 1 year of ownership.

They forgot to put the temp gauge in. OK, so it's something else to worry about, but to me it should be part of the basic dials.

Lastly, fuel needs to be minimum 98RON. I use Shell V-Power 100RON as it gives me more kilometers, so the cost is worth it to me, but you pay the price for a high-pressure turbo engine.

Overall the car is great. It's not got the full quality of a Golf, but it makes up for it if you want to have fun in a fast way.

You learn where the speed cameras are with this car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th August, 2011

Average review marks: 7.0 / 10, based on 9 reviews