1995 Mazda 626 LX review from North America
"Good, reliable car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Just normal repairs: boots repaired, belts replaced, brakes, exhaust system repaired (normal to cold climate), transmission fluid leak fixed.
General comments?
This is my second Mazda 626 and they were both good cars with relatively few problems. The first Mazda was a 1996 and this is a 1995, neither have had transmission problems.
Recommended reviews
| This car sucks! I hate this heap of junk! |
|
| Stylish and Relativley reliable if you get the Automatic |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 25000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 77000 miles |
| Previous car | Mazda 626 |
| Date of Entry | 9th January, 2005 |