1979 Mercedes-Benz W123 Reviews

1979 Mercedes-Benz W123 240d non turbo from North America

Model year1979
Year of manufacture1979
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission non turbo Automatic
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 1 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 1 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
2.8 / 10
Distance when acquired112000 miles
Most recent distance118000 miles
Previous carSaturn SL

Summary:

Buy it for the style, not the value

Faults:

Ignition switch went.

Fuel injector pump failed.

Lots of rubber needed to be replaced due to the sheer age of the vehicle.

Hood cable broke.

Brake fluid leaked.

The cost of repairs isn't bad now that I've found a mechanic who knows what he's doing. But I had to get ripped off a couple times first.

If you want my advice, have two mechanics; a general guy who knows a fair amount about them and a specialist for those difficult issues. Also, don't buy the cheapest one on eBay. Spend $5-7000 and get a near mint one with low miles with lots of recent maintenance history. Otherwise you'll spend the same in repairs, and have a car that is more familiar with your mechanics garage than your own.

General Comments:

Acceleration is semi truck slow, especially with an auto (I prefer manuals). 0-60 mph is 30 seconds! They are very comfy to sit in and feel solid all around. I've never had a problem starting it in cold weather, though a block heater will increase the life of your engine. 17f with no block heater and she started after about five minutes. Parts can be surprisingly cheap at the junk yard. I average 27mpg.

If you want a classic style and decent value, buy this car. If you want the best value and can afford to spend a few grand more, get a Jetta diesel. The fuel economy is more like 47 instead of 27 and it will cost you less to own in the long run. genegenre@yahoo.com

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 5th June, 2009

4th Nov 2009, 11:28

Uhhh are you serious? Only giving it a 1 for reliability? I think you need a different car if you think the 240 is not reliable.

1979 Mercedes-Benz W123 240D N/A diesel from North America

Model year1979
Year of manufacture1979
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission N/A diesel Manual
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired226900 miles
Most recent distance242000 miles
Previous carPontiac Sunfire

Summary:

The car has been the best thing I've ever done

Faults:

~RUST~ Major issue, but easily reparable. look for floor pans near rear seats, as well as front sub-frame.

Had pans completely replaced @ 238000.

~Starter, common dead spots. not yet replaced but still functional.

~Slave Cylinder 242000 miles.

General Comments:

~Incredibly Slow.

~About the same mpg as a 300D turbo or N/A.

~ ultra reliable.

~block heater isn't necessary.

~ brakes can get temper-mental.

No ABS : (

4 speed manual is AMAZING.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 1st April, 2008

1st Apr 2008, 19:35

Ha we also had a 1979 240D and our experience was about like yours, but the rust we had was a result of a bad paint job done by the "restoration" shop. The only other problem we ever had was the A/C compressor failed when the car was 18 years old (~wow~). You say no ABS, but ours did have "anti-skid" brakes, a primitive form of ABS, only difference being that they were not electronically controlled. Ours was also incredibly slow, and you're right about the mileage; the same can be accomplished in the 300D/TD versions which are much more powerful. Great cars, will have another W123 one day hopefully.

3rd Jul 2008, 12:48

I don't understand this primitive ABS system. All of the w123 ABS are electronic.

2nd Aug 2008, 11:46

I'm looking at buying one of these cars. What is the mpg?

4th Aug 2008, 12:58

I've heard of mid 40's with these on average.

1979 Mercedes-Benz W123 280e 2.8 petrol from North America

Model year1979
Year of manufacture1979
First year of ownership1979
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 2.8 petrol Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired20 miles
Most recent distance176928 miles
Previous carVolvo 440

Summary:

A VERY reliable car with a timeless look and an excellent reputation

Faults:

Seats are starting to sag and wear.

Costly repairs, probably because it is an older car and parts are harder to find.

Minor electrical problems.

Car seems to be getting slower over the years.

General Comments:

Very comfortable seats, although starting to sag.

Probably the most durable car I have ever seen.

Reliable engine, but engine is very heavy causing the car to lug on the highway.

Car stills runs strong after 176,928 miles, and still will after 300,000.

Beautiful, original paint finish - never touched up or repainted, but there are some very small bubbles by the bottoms of the doors.

Timeless look, always a head-turner.

I'm very proud to own this car, and always have been. I hope it lasts forever.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th October, 2006

Average review marks: 7.8 / 10, based on 14 reviews