2000 Mercury Grand Marquis Reviews - Page 2 of 5

2000 Mercury Grand Marquis LS 4.6L V8 from North America

Model year2000
Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 4.6L V8 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired26888 miles
Most recent distance27000 miles
Previous carFord Escape

Summary:

Not just for the blue-hairs anymore!

Faults:

Brake pedal makes a low squeaky noise when depressed.

General Comments:

I needed a decent used car under 12k dollars and under 60k miles. All the Camrys, Accords, Grand Prix models were too pricey (for 50-60,000 miles) or didn't have the amenities that I was looking for. And low and behold, I find this gorgeous 2000 MGM with 27k mile4s for a little over $10,000. Some snowbird elderly woman had it in Florida and hadn't barely used it since 2002. I swear the passenger or rear seats have never been sat in. Just sitting in this beauty makes me feel like I got one hell of a steal!

It is like new, and the comfort is excellent! Leather, everything electric, bigger than I could've imagined... finally a car that I don't have to put the seat all the way back! I have a baby on the way, and who says you have to be 60+ years old to own one of these? My new MGM is the perfect family car... I recommend it for those of you tired of the SUV phenomenon. I live in south Florida, so snow isn't a question... what the hell do I need an SUV for? There is more trunk space than the entire back of my Ford Escape.

I love this car!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 29th May, 2006

28th Oct 2007, 18:08

Bravo! I agree entirely. The Grand Marquis is an excellent car, and you don't have to be a senior citizen to appreciate the many good points to this road cruiser that is just one step below the Lincoln Town Car itself. Cars like the Grand Marquis are roomy, comfortable and safe, and can carry as many people and as much luggage as almost any SUV.

I don't understand the perception some people have that big cars are boring, only liked by the elderly, and are too large and old-fashioned to be competitive in today's auto market. You can't get more boring than most Japanese imports. As a big fan of big, V8-powered American cars, I don't understand the idea that these cars are obsolete. How can they be, when the even more monstrous SUV's are even bigger, bulkier and far more dangerous and less efficient. Tradition and practicality should always be placed above image when it comes to any vehicle this size, and the Grand Marquis offers both in a superb package.

2nd Dec 2007, 23:57

I agree with both of you gentlemen.

I have a '99 grand marquis fully loaded with 370,000 miles.

It runs like new!

I'm 19 not 65 and I get a lot of compliments from the ladies in my age group.

I never want to own another vehicle!

Long live Grand Marquis!!!

2000 Mercury Grand Marquis GS 4.6V8 from North America

Model year2000
Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 4.6V8 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.6 / 10
Distance when acquired15 miles
Most recent distance35000 miles
Previous carMercury Grand Marquis

Summary:

It's the"perfect family sedan"

Faults:

The battery was replaced at 30,000 miles.Also, the tires were recently replaced.

General Comments:

We truly love the car a lot. It's extremely comfortable, and is perfect for long distance family road trips. Plus, it's very safe and reliable.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th February, 2006

2000 Mercury Grand Marquis LS 4.6 from North America

Model year2000
Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 4.6 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired80000 miles
Most recent distance132000 miles
Previous carFord Crown Victoria

Summary:

Good economical tranportation

Faults:

Rear axle carrier bearing.

Idle speed motor.

Heater core.

Transmission jerky in cold weather between 40 - 50 mph unless overdrive is disabled.

General Comments:

I have done a lot of towing and pulling trees down etc with this car, so some driveline problems were expected.

Otherwise the car has been very reliable, and it is easy to work on.

I get about 18 mpg city and 27 mpg doing 70 on the interstate.

It will get up to 60 in about 8 seconds, and has plenty of passing power, even towing a 1500 lb boat. It handles surprisingly well, nothing like the old boats of the 70's, though you can still tell there is a solid rear axle.

The ride is smooth, not overly soft though. The seats are very comfortable, long trips are a pleasure. It could use a little more rear legroom.

The trunk is huge, as big as a bed on Toyota pickup.

This car would make a good alternative to an SUV or minivan as a family vehicle.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th November, 2005

Average review marks: 8.3 / 10, based on 14 reviews