1994 Peugeot 106 Reviews

1994 Peugeot 106 XND Graduate 1.5 diesel from UK and Ireland

Model year1994
Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2011
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 1.5 diesel Manual
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 3 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.5 / 10
Distance when acquired144000 miles
Most recent distance147000 miles
Previous carFord Focus

Summary:

As basic as it gets, and all the better for it

Faults:

CV joints on both driveshafts clicking.

Sometimes surges on acceleration.

Driver's seat creaks.

Washer pump was seized.

Heated screen doesn't work.

Rear axle starting to sag.

Radiator is starting to rot!

Usual leaky filter head, bypassed with aftermarket unit..

General Comments:

Well, thanks to the government ripping us off on fuel, the insurance industry wanting its pound of flesh, and the local traffic police and their revenue cameras, I have been forced to downgrade to a small car again.

A trawl of the local secondhand car sites turned up a 106 diesel of 1994 vintage for the mere sum of £300. Considering most 106 diesels are well over £500, this example with 10 months MOT seemed to be a bit of a bargain!

I've owned several Citroen AX's in the past, and the 106 is basically an AX clone. The 1.5 engine and gearbox were identical with the AX one, so I knew it would be reliable. The clicky CV joints were pretty much to be expected too. Possibly it doesn't handle as well as the AX, more down to wear and tear than any fault of the car. The cheap price means that it won't break the bank to overhaul the suspension if I decide to keep it for a while.

Comfort wise, apart from the excellent heater, the car has no mod cons at all, not even a 12v socket! Which after my adventures with an old Audi A4 was something of a relief. The paintwork is faded beyond redemption, being a matte white colour now, and the aluminium sunroof surround will need rubbed down and repainted; jobs for next year.

Of course the only reason anybody buys a 17 year old diesel 106 is for fuel economy, the car's major good point, despite being allegedly less aerodynamic than the AX and having more miles than my example, it's much easier on juice; I'm averaging over 60mpg. Admittedly I seldom exceed 60mph these days, but it's cheaper to run than most small cars. Certainly, if it keeps going, it cannot depreciate any more.

The car is 17 now, and is getting to that dangerously endearing stage, where more than the car's worth will be spent on it to keep it going, but in these austere times, a gradual replacement of all dodgy parts might well work out cheaper than buying something else with problems of its own.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 23rd November, 2011

3rd Jan 2012, 10:02

I like your review above, and you couldn't have put it better as regards the vultures, which there doesn't seem to be any end of. They're all out there, all waiting to feed on us, from corrupt insurance companies to oil companies. I hope you have many reliable miles in it. I am on the lookout for a Citroen ZX or similar, and like you I have driven a B5 Passat TDI, which is almost the same as an A4; no end of pulling power, but costly parts which do need replacing, but no character compared to a little Pug or Citroen.

1994 Peugeot 106 Ski 1.1 from Jersey

Model year1994
Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2009
Most recent year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission 1.1 Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.5 / 10
Distance when acquired71000 miles
Most recent distance78000 miles

Summary:

The BEST car I ever had

Faults:

Timing belt snapped.

General Comments:

This car was the best car in the world.

Although it broke, I would give a hand to have it back. If you have this car and it still works, be proud of it.

I could manage 0-60 in 10 seconds, and was very quick off the mark. 1.1 is all you need nowadays.

I now drive a Ford Fiesta LX 1999, and this car is pants compared to it.

It was so comfortable, I even decided to have a sleep in it after having a couple of drinks.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 24th March, 2010

1994 Peugeot 106 Mardi Gras 1.4 diesel from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1994
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 1.4 diesel Manual
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired76000 miles
Most recent distance77000 miles

Summary:

Good value for money and great as a first car

Faults:

According to the MOT and service documents mine had a new engine a few years back, but this was mainly due to negligence by the previous owner. Other than that not much. Paint work has faded which appears to be a common problem.

General Comments:

+ Fun to drive, cheap to run, easy to maneuvers and park, looks good.

- Cramped in the back, paint work faded (common problem as it seems).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th November, 2007

Average review marks: 7.5 / 10, based on 23 reviews