1989 Peugeot 405 Reviews - Page 3 of 7

1989 Peugeot 405 Mi16 1.9 Twin-cam 16v from North America

Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 1.9 Twin-cam 16v Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired109000 miles
Most recent distance134000 miles
Previous carPeugeot 505

Summary:

Forget the BMW or Saab you're considering and get the best Mi16 you can find

Faults:

Very little has gone wrong with this car in the 25,000 miles I've had it.

- Rear window roller disintegrated

- Thermostat died

- Fuel filter needed replacement.

Apart from basic maintenance, that's it.

General Comments:

It really upsets me that nobody bought these cars in the U.S. market when they had their chance, because if they had Peugeot might still be selling cars here today.

Dynamically, this is one of the best cars I have ever driven, never mind owned. The only way to describe it is neutral - the chassis is unbelievably responsive, progressive, and communicative. In a corner, you know *exactly* where this car is at all times, and what it's going to do next.

Steering is pin-sharp. The tranny is slick and precise. The only (minor) letdown comes from the brakes which, on my car at least, fall squarely into the 'good-but-could-be-better' category. Then again, my car doesn't have ABS, so ABS-ed models may be something of an improvement.

Performance is passable: the 1905cc 16V twin-cam pulls the car to 60mph in about 8 seconds or so. However, it's all top-end: there's no torque in an Mi16 below 5000 RPM. Redline's at 7000, though, and the sound of the engine has to be heard to be both enjoyed and believed - it's very reminiscent of the two-litre units Fiat used in countless 124 Spiders, but without the characteristic roughness of those engines. Also, if you start loading up on passengers and / or cargo, you will rapidly begin to notice that it is a relatively small-displacement engine.

Interior specs are comprehensive: leather, air-conditioning, sunroof, power windows and door/trunk locks, cruise control, fog lights... It's all there. Not toys for the sake of having toys, but items that really make it more enjoyable to live with the car.

Downsides: early 405s in general suffered from some body flex, so evey couple of months I have to go around the car with a screwdriver and tighten things down to keep squaeks and rattles at bay. It's also not really designed to accomodate people over six feet tall.

Off the mark, it doesn't have as much grunt low-down as I'd like, but keep it on the boil and it flies. The gearing is excellent; downshifting from 5th to 3rd at 60mph and passing cars before you have to upshift again at nearly 80 usually results in other drivers looking at you with an 'I-just-got-passed-by-*what*' expression, and keeping a respectful distance after that.

Too bad I can't go spend new car money on a 406 Coupe here, because I would just on the basis of how good the Mi16 is.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 15th August, 2002

1989 Peugeot 405 Mi16 1.9 from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 1.9 Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.8 / 10
Distance when acquired65000 miles
Most recent distance70000 miles
Previous carVolvo 480

Summary:

For £500 I couldn't have been happier

Faults:

Serviced on 31/5/02.

Mild rust forming on rear wheel arch.

General Comments:

From the first moment I test drove this car, I knew I just had to buy it.

The engine sounds fantastic, and revs cleanly to 7000 RPM.

There is plenty of room for 5 occupants and all of there luggage in the enormous boot.

Down sides are higher costs of parts, and an average of 30mpg, but that's not too bad for a 160 HP car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd August, 2002

3rd Aug 2002, 05:15

I had a 1992 1.9 Mi16 and unfortunately had a lot go wrong with it, but it was a lovely car to drive and the handling was fantastic for it's size. I'm now in the process of sticking the engine into a 309 GTI.

18th Sep 2003, 14:41

For a 15 year used car the MI16 has held up well. Has a few rattles. At 100,5000 miles it drives, rides, handles, most importantly get up to speed in a quite brisk manner. Took it to a dragstrip once e.t. 14.56@97 m.p.h. Old American muscle car grounds. Plus you don't see them here in Texas.

Average review marks: 7.4 / 10, based on 30 reviews