SAAB 99 Reviews

1973 SAAB 99 EMS 2.0 from North America

Model year1973
Year of manufacture1972
First year of ownership1973
Engine and transmission 2.0 Manual
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 0 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 2 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 1 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
2.8 / 10
Distance when acquired12 miles
Most recent distance62000 miles
Previous carVolkswagen Type III

Summary:

One of the worst cars ever made

Faults:

This remains the worst car I have ever owned.

- Clutch master & slave cylinder twice (18000 & 62000).

- Front brake pads 6500, 13500, 20,000. Finally found a harder compound, which made it all the way to 35000. Brake master cylinder twice.

- Engine mounts broke, entire drive train would move back and forth even before & after repair.

- Entire exhaust system 3 times. Exhaust manifold fell off the engine.

- Fuel injectors leaked. Windows fell off lifts, crank handle broke. Seat heater failed.

- Primary shaft to transmission and gear both failed at 41000. Waited 2 months for parts from Sweden.

- 2nd gear synchro 42000, had to shift 1-3 most of the time.

-Tach stopped at 23000, windshield wiper motor twice, other electrical problems.

General Comments:

This car was fun for a few minutes a month, then reality would slap me in the face. It only made it to 62K miles before it was finished. The only thing that worked decently was the Triumph engine.

SAAB made planes. I said I would never fly in one because of all the problems I had with this horrible car. I did fly on a SAAB/Fairchild turboprop years later and survived.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 11th August, 2010

11th Aug 2010, 11:12

1973 was a Swedish engine. 1970 was the last year of the Triumph.

11th Aug 2010, 18:17

And there are so many who accuse GM of mucking Saab up...

22nd Aug 2010, 00:46

SAAB had many problems long before GM. Most 72-74 99's were junk. The day I picked it up, the windshield wiper motor blew and it took 2 weeks to get a new one. A bad omen.

Another warranty repair got me a loaner model 96 with the Ford V4. It started on fire from the carb (a common problem, I was told by the dealer). Only a neighbor loaning me a fire extinguisher saved it from ruin. The French mechanic who worked at the dealer said "it is a piece of sh**" He knew because the dealer also sold Renault.

1976 SAAB 99 GL 2.0 from North America

Model year1976
Year of manufacture1976
Most recent year of ownership1998
Engine and transmission 2.0 Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
10.0 / 10
Distance when acquired5000 miles
Most recent distance450000 miles
Previous carBMW 2002

Summary:

One of the best cars ever made

Faults:

The slave cylinder would go about every 25,000 miles. It was an easy fix that my dealer showed me how to do. No matter where I was, I could tell the mechanic how to change it even if he wasn't familiar with the vehicle.

General Comments:

Never had anything so reliable or comfortable to drive. Could (and did) drive it all day and never get tired.

Handling and safety were top notch. The cabin was roomy and the trunk space was awesome.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 8th May, 2009

1977 SAAB 99 GLI 2 litre from Australia and New Zealand

Year of manufacture1977
First year of ownership1977
Most recent year of ownership1981
Engine and transmission 2 litre Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired10 kilometres
Most recent distance270000 kilometres

Summary:

Way ahead of its time at the time, but now out dated (30 years old, but!!)

Faults:

Water pump failed at 150,000 km.

Starter ring wore out at 200,000 km.

General Comments:

Brilliant car, ultra-reliable, superb handling, in its day, quite fuel-efficient although it took the corolla nearly 20 years to catch up.

Quite heavy for a "small" car, it steers very well at the time. This had non-assisted rack-and-pinion steering- very heavy in the car-park, but brilliant on the open road, or at any speed above 40kph.

The 99 series is hopelessly outdated now, but looking back on it, in its day it really was far ahead of nearly everything in many ways (SAAB used the fact that Stig Blomqvist won the world rally championship in the late 70's in a SAAB 99 in their advertising).

Electrically adjustable mirrors (via a little joy-stick) and heated seats were way ahead of anything else, as was its gear-lock- the ignition key was down by the handbrake and locked the auto transmission in "Park"- the vehicle could not be moved (stolen) without the key to unlock the transmission.

A very upright seating position and the wrap-around windscreen made it feel so unique- like a jet-fighter (or so I imagine).

By modern standards it is quite thirsty on fuel, but that is the price to pay for a heavy, strong (and safe) car. I traded it in on a Corolla for the fuel benefits (and cheaper spares) as the dealer was charging big dollars to maintain my investment.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th October, 2006

Average review marks: 6.8 / 10, based on 11 reviews


Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews