2000 Saturn SL review from North America
"Excellent Value"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I have experienced No part failures on this car what so ever. Wearable parts and routine maintenance has been performed regularly and I consistently perform 3,000 mile oil changes using Full synthetic motor oil. I have changed spark plugs, spark plug wires, PVC valve, EGR valve, brake pads, tires, and air filters.
General comments?
Excellent Fuel Efficiency (average 39 mpg)
Reliable and dependable car when properly maintained.
Smooth transmission and engine.
Body panels maintain their finish and shine well without the need for excessive washing and waxing.
Seats are uncomfortable when driving long distances.
Engine is somewhat underpowered. I would opt for the manual transmission for this reason.
Simply the best economy car I know of.
Recommended reviews
| Happy little economic car! |
|
| Very good sport-compact, great value, not a muscle-car |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2000 |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2008 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.9L Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 3 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 121000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 167000 miles |
| Previous car | Mazda 626 |
| Date of Entry | 8th April, 2008 |