1993 Toyota MR2 Non Turbo review from North America
"Best bang for your buck"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
My valve guides started leaking.
Timing belt and compressor belt needs changing.
General comments?
MR2 takes on turns like no other car I have ever driven. But the seats although very sporty are not comfortable for a long drive.
Most mechanics hate working on this car because of the tight space in the engine compartment. But as far as things breaking down, Toyota has no problems at 100,000 + miles.
Recommended reviews
| To sum it up, the MR2 can't be beat for the value, performance and overall Toyota quality. |
|
| 1991 - MR2 Turbo 2.0 Litre turbo If you can find one in good shape, it will be the buy of a lifetime |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1993 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.2 Manual |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 3 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 98000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 105000 miles |
| Previous car | Nissan Altima |
| Date of Entry | 8th April, 2003 |