1996 Toyota Supra Twin Turbo from North America - Comments

Comments: 1-15, 16-30, 31-45, 46-60, 61-75, 76-90, 91

28th Jan 2006, 12:21

You only compare very cheap cars like the Camaro, firebirds, mustangs,- which is half the price of the supra TT. Even the camaro is way cheaper, the top speed is 165 vs the supra TT's 150mph. So why don't you race the Supra non Turbo vs the Canmaro non turbo? Now, why don't you race the supra TT vs the Corvette twin turbo? (callaway sledge hammer- 220 mph)

You only compare the basic cars vs the top of the line supra TT. How about a viper rt10? Why don't you compare supra with it? Also how about a stock corvette z-06? (0-60 in 3.4 sec and 198 mph top speed- yes, it's from the factory.) Don't get me wrong the supra is an OK car in the USA but it cna't match the performance of the v8's, v10's, v12's in any competition.

A 1971 de tomaso pantera (35 years old) will surely outperform the supra on straight or slalom. A street legal semi modified pantera goes over 220 mph and that's only for street use- and yes, no smog devices ever.

Vote:

Further comment posting to this review is disabled because of abuse

All Toyota Supra reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews