1995 Volvo 850 Reviews - Page 5 of 20

1995 Volvo 850 T5R AUT B5234T from Netherlands

Model year1995
Year of manufacture1995
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission B5234T Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired330000 kilometres
Most recent distance453000 kilometres
Previous carVolvo 850

Summary:

Character

Faults:

I've had three 850's so far.

A Diesel. Had it chiptuned. Aftermarket ECC had to be replaced. Cost me USD 2.000. Ran it for about 2 years.

A 10 Valve gasoline car, converted to run on Liquefied Petrol Gas. (Any idea how cheap that is...) Sold it when it had 453000 km (300.000 miles) on it. Replaced cylinder head (cost me about USD 1.000)

My current one: A T5R Turbocharged station. When I just got it, it ran badly (smoking, stuttering at higher RPM). I knew this from the test drive. But since I know how well the engine is designed, I trusted it was no problem in the core of the engine (head, cylinders, pistons, turbo), but more likely bad maintenance that could be improved.

Turned out it hadn't been serviced for 2 years (haunted down last owner, he told me). They put wrong plugs in: imitation, wrong type and the were worn out). They put imitation cables and rotater in. These engines are very sensitive to misuse in that department. We put in the right stuff and problems solved. Yes, a complete overhaul, (as advised to me by mechanics less familiar with Volvo) would have solved the problem too, because then new plugs 'd have been put in as well. But complete overkill. Next week I'll have an LPG installation put in again (car is now at 225.000 km = 150.000 miles.

General Comments:

In general: These cars are very well designed but have small tolerances. For instance, the engine is made out of aluminium instead of steel. Much lighter, but much more perceptive to heat damage as well. You cannot just throw in some parts or lubricants that seem just about right, (like in some X year old American car with a huge gas guzzling engine in it based on engine technique dating back to the 60s, repairable with hammer and a spanner (yes, I am exaggerating) ), you need to use high end stuff of the correct specs.

Reading the posts here, I see a lot of examples of overkill repairs, and things that seem to happen when people who do not know EXACTLY what they're doing, do standard maintenance and problem solving using wrong parts and fluids, and who don't know the peculiarities of these cars.

Here in Europe, on the roads you can see many ancient Volvos and Mercedes. No other brands have that many that old cars on the streets. That says something about quality. But yes, they do have some typical faults. Not expensive to deal with if you know your stuff. Expensive repairs can happen though, but are usually worth it because these cars keep on running. They are sold here for fairly high prices with 600.000 km (that's about 400.000 miles) on them.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 20th February, 2010

1995 Volvo 850 Turbo 2.3L I5 turbo from North America

Model year1995
Year of manufacture1995
First year of ownership2009
Most recent year of ownership2010
Engine and transmission 2.3L I5 turbo Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired229300 kilometres
Most recent distance249880 kilometres
Previous carMazda 626

Summary:

Great luxury sport sedan for those who are sick of German cars!!!

Faults:

My radiator recently went around 247200km; cost about $175 for the radiator plus $200 labour.

Recently did a full tune-up at a cost of $310; pretty fair price.

My driver'ss side seat belt broke last week; $100 with parts and labour to replace it..

Overall this has been a good car with minor imperfections. Would definitely purchase another Volvo again, probably an S60 turbo for sure...

Paid $2700 total with taxes and emissions safety test...

General Comments:

The car is equipped with an inline 5 cylinder engine high pressure turbo 2.3 litre 222hp. It is really fast and handles well. My advice is don't beat the hell out of these cars and they will last a really long time...

The seats are really comfortable. It even has a sport button option by the shifter for those who wanna take a head start from a stop position.

I recommend Sunoco 94 octane fuel, it really helps the boost on the car!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 12th January, 2010

Average review marks: 7.6 / 10, based on 56 reviews