Similar Volvo S40 reviews

2001
USA FlagCanada Flag

S40

Reliability, comfort, performance, safety, and a good looking ride in one package

92 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

S40

I will never buy another Volvo

88 words
Spain Flag

S40 Sport Car

Poor post sale service

79 words
Turkey Flag

S40 2.0T

We expect better car from Volvo

79 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

S40 T4 SE

Understated Motorway blaster- Luxury Wolf in Swedish Sheep clothing

77 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

S40

My S-40 is a true lemon

69 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

S40

Compact, safe, rock-solid reliable, luxury sedan

68 words
All Volvo S40 reviews

2001 Volvo S40 2.0T review from Turkey

"We expect better car from Volvo"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Spare parts are very expensive: RH headlight wiper engine is 300Euros. Automatic transmission fluid is 17 Euros per liter. Also interior plastic mechanisms are not working well. Performance is reduced after 50000 Km because of defective turbo compressor. All bearings are working noisily. We paid 70000 Euros for this car, but we could not find what we expected.

General comments?

Fuel consumption is around 10 Lt/100km. It is good for 170hp engine.

Performance is acceptable. Steering is good except during acceleration.

1 comment

Recommended Reviews:

Australia FlagNew Zealand Flag

2001 - S40 2.0 SE 2.0 140bhp

An average performer

USA FlagCanada Flag

2000 - S40 1.9 Turbo

Fun to drive a real sleeper. Laugh as Beamers and Audis try to catch up!

All 2001 Volvo S40 reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 8/10
Reliability marks 7/10
Comfort marks 8/10
Dealer Service marks 0/10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6/10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance96000 kilometres
Previous carVolkswagen Golf
Date of Entry 7th November, 2003

All Volvo S40 reviews