1992 Buick Century Custom review from North America
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Power windows would stick in the down position and it would take an act of God to wiggle the switch right to get them to go back up.
General comments?
Coming from a Park Avenue, the Century was horrible. Way too small, extremely cheap fabrics, and feel to the whole package. I can't believe Buick made a car like this. Looks like the new body styles are better, but my body style had been around since 1982! Why did I buy the car you ask? Great deal, and I found out why. For a small family, or someone who doesn't care what they drive, this would be a good car.
Recommended reviews
| Rusty, yet trusty |
|
| A solid, great-running car, but plagued by GM design "innovations" and service issues |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 1992 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 1999 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.3 liter Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 3 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 miles |
| Most recent distance | 42000 miles |
| Previous car | Buick Park Avenue |
| Date of Entry | 31st May, 2000 |