1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS review from North America
"Its too dangerous to be on the highway"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
My 1995 Monte Carlo is a lemon. I've done put 3 motors in it, 1 transmission, 3 rack and pinions, 7 starters, 1 set of transmission lines, 4 alternators, 2 anti-lock speed sensors. My computer had to be reprogrammed. My turn signal switch is messed up to where its not letting my brake lights work. I have to hold the switch back to make my brake lights work. A new complete air conditioning system.
All of my interior paneling is trying to fall off. The seat belts don't want to hold car seats for children.
General comments?
The 1995 Monte Carlo was not worth putting on the highway. I have put more money in this car, than the loan itself. I do not recommend anyone buying this car. It looks good, but its not dependable.
Recommended reviews
| 1995 - Monte Carlo z34 Gasoline This car is good if you treat it right. |
|
| 1988 - Monte Carlo SS 5.0L 305CI Great everyday car, but easily upgradeable to a weekend warrior |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 1998 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.1 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 3 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 2 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 2 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 45000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 173360 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Monte Carlo |
| Date of Entry | 26th August, 2004 |