Fiat 500 Reviews

2009 Fiat 500 Lounge 1.2 petrol from UK and Ireland

Model year2009
Year of manufacture2009
First year of ownership2009
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 1.2 petrol Manual
Performance marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance81000 miles
Previous carFord Fiesta

Summary:

Reputation-restoring excellence for Fiat

Faults:

Clutch needed replacement at 67000 miles.

Occasional ECU warning messages needed resetting.

Wheel cylinder replaced after a leak at 52500 miles.

Rear lens cluster needed replacing because of water ingress.

Rear bulbs tend to blow more often than in most cars.

General Comments:

I bought this car to use as my driving school vehicle. This is possibly the toughest role for any small car today. Fiats do not have a great reputation for reliability, but I calculated that the funky styling and great reputation amongst teenagers would win me more business than any unreliability would lose me.

The car is small but well packaged, and drivers of all sizes can get comfortable in it.

The exterior styling is attractive, and far more faithful to the spirit of the original than, say, BMW's bloated take on the Mini. The compact dimensions and small overhangs also mean that the 500 is a very good city car.

The interior is also nicely styled. With the glass roof of the Lounge model, it is an airy and pleasant place to spend time.

The 1.2 engine needs revving hard to deliver any performance, and this affects fuel consumption, which has averaged only 48 MPG in my tenure. Bear in mind that as a 300 miles-per-week driving school car, this is not a bad figure at all.

The car still washes up like brand new inside and out. There are no rattles or squeaks. Very surprising for a Fiat.

The worst part about this car is the ride. It is unsettled and jiggly at low speed, to the extent that it can affect the steering over moderate bumps. It needs far better damping.

To be honest, apart from these points it is hard to fault the 500. I would certainly consider another as a driving school car, and even more as a private car with a much easier life.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 4th May, 2013

2012 Fiat 500 Sport 1.4 from North America

Model year2012
Year of manufacture2012
First year of ownership2012
Most recent year of ownership2013
Engine and transmission 1.4 Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.2 / 10
Distance when acquired5 miles
Most recent distance7000 miles
Previous carMitsubishi Lancer

Summary:

Style over substance

Faults:

The worst quality plastics I have seen in a car, including 1980s Yugos. Door panels scratch after jeans brush them.

Vinyl seats stain with a whitish stain after elbow contact.

The vehicle is filled with squeaks and rattles after less than 8,000 miles -- something I would not expect of a $20,000 "premium small car".

The tires lose air pressure and require constant refills.

The Bose audio system causes buzzes and rattles throughout the car when turned up to a merely adequate volume.

The rear fold-down seats rattle and squeak due to loose attachments to the latch.

The driver's seat has loose portions that "thud" and "clunk" around during acceleration, stops, and sharp turns.

The control buttons for the climate system are beginning to stain and change color after the buttons have been pressed a few times.

General Comments:

This car is an absolute disappointment.

I purchased it to get a "premium small car" with plenty of comfort, decent handling and good fuel economy for a grueling urban commute.

What I got was a pimped up cheap econobox, with flashy styling features that wear away fast, and decent handling.

The quality of this car's interior is utterly appalling. I would have expected better from a $9,000 Kia. The plastic used in the doors can literally be scratched by having your blue jeans rub against the door. I've owned seven other cars, and none of them had cheap, soft plastic like this car.

The quality of the other interior components is way below par, especially for the price point. The vinyl seats are starting to stain at just 8,000 miles, and scrubbing with warm water and a cloth doesn't help that much. The buttons on the dashboard are staining due to simple finger contact. The driver's door armrest is staining similarly to the vinyl seat.

The entire car's fit-and-finish seems okay on visual inspection, but start to drive it and lots of flaws emerge after just a couple of months of ownership. My driver's seat has a "clunk" inside of it that feels like a slipping anchor point, poorly mounted internal airbag, or some other component that is "thumping" at hard stops, starts, or turns. The entire car is a creaky, rattly mess -- my 2001 Sebring convertible had fewer squeaks, rattles and body flex noises after 8 years than this car has in less than 8 months of ownership. The rattles and buzzes are so bad at speed that one has to raise his voice to have a conversation.

Mechanically, the car has been reliable (something that's reasonable to expect just eight months into the ownership experience), but overall the quality of this car is WAY below what it should be for the price. Resale values reflect this -- the car has already depreciated by over 35%, a much steeper hit than other comparably priced cars.

If this was a $10,000 car, I wouldn't be so harsh, but for the $17,000 to almost $30,000 (in Abarth trim) that this vehicle sells for, almost everything about the build quality and materials should be much, much better.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 11th January, 2013

18th Jan 2013, 18:57

I am wondering if maybe you happened to get a lemon, it does happen. So far, my Fiat 500 (going on 3,000 miles) still looks the exact same inside, no "scratches" at all. Also, still tight, no squeaks or rattles, no leaking air pressure, not one fault. Actually, the more I drive it, the more impressed I am with it. Sorry you are not satisfied with your purchase.

6th Feb 2013, 20:26

I'm the original author, and I didn't get a lemon. A rental Pop that I drove had similar issues, and the scratched-plastic-door issue is well-documented on various Fiat forums.

The scratches are much more noticeable on black plastic doors than white ones. Perhaps you have a white one.

Also, the rattles and squeaks didn't really kick off until about 5,000 miles. I'd come back after a year and see if you've still got a quiet car.

Now sure, squeaks and rattles aren't a reliability issue per se, but they're something one expects in a much cheaper car like a Kia or Yaris.

16th Mar 2013, 19:54

I have 18,000 miles on my 2012 Fiat 500, and have not had any of the issues described above. Not one warranty visit.

1st Apr 2013, 19:05

I looked at Fiat 500s this year and last year at the local auto show, and was amazed at the wear shown on the leather seats from all the people getting in and out of them. Granted, the car is relatively new and I am sure lots of people were sitting in them. But, the other cars at the show did not demonstrate that kind of wear. The red leather had dark stains... sort of like being worn or perhaps dye from reacting with blue jeans?

All accounts leading up to the release of the car promised a small boutique luxury car, sort of like the old VW Rabbit Convertibles. I was disappointed by the cheap plastics as well. It may be Italian (a rare sight here in the US), but that only goes so far.

Average review marks: 7.8 / 10, based on 11 reviews