1999 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer V8 from North America


Good engine performance, poor ride


I'd have to say that overall, our car has run pretty well. We take very good care of it, change the oil regularly and the engine seems to be in great condition. Problems are that road noise is pretty loud and if you add in the radio, you can hardly talk to a passenger. Like most of it's kind, the LCD screen on the dash is gone and repair is +$200. The rear wiper is goofed up and will only clean a small portion of the window. The leather seats are okay, but showing wear.

General Comments:

I don't like the way this vehicle drives. The ride is very very bumpy... you can feel each and every nuance in the road. It was really hard on me when I was pregnant.

The good side is that it runs great and repair costs have been minimal.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 8th January, 2004

1st Mar 2006, 02:09

Agree with the above. Have 1999 Eddie Bauer and the stereo display went out a long time ago, the rear wiper also doesn't work well despite "fixes." No major engine fixes after 46K miles, other than a gasket that blew at 20K. Idles very roughly on cold mornings and stalls out if you don't let it warm up for 3-4 minutes. Ride is rough, although redesign in 2000 may give smoother ride.

1999 Ford Explorer Sport V6 from North America


I wish I still had it today!


The clutch started squealing at less than 1000 miles, but that is probably because I learned how to drive manual shift on this vehicle. All of this was replaced under warranty. No problems since then.

The rear window wiper never did work efficiently. When it did work, the wiper never fully contacted all of the window. Then it got to the point that it just didn't work at all. I got it fixed once, but it just started doing the same thing again... so I figured who needs it anyway!

I needed to change the tires because of the Firestone recall. I initially paid for the new tires, but Ford reimbursed me for them later.

A tail light went out. I replaced it at minimal cost ($5 maybe).

General Comments:

This vehicle served me well. I drove it from Florida to Minnesota and back, Florida to California and back, and from Florida to Pennsylvania. Great ride, and reliable. This car took care of me up until the time it was totaled when I hit black ice on a bridge. I miss it dearly.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th December, 2003

24th Oct 2005, 14:56

It's almost as if you were driving my '99 Explorer Sport as I experienced the exact same issues you described.

In addition, I also have had problems with the driver side remote key-less entry not working (lock sticks), but this is more inconvenience, not a big deal.

Overall, I've been satisfied with the vehicle. Got my replacement tires after the Firestone recall at about 20,000 miles and still have those same tires even though I'm now at 80,000 miles (I will be replacing soon before the winter hits). Guess this lack of tire wear says a lot about the even ride of the vehicle.

1999 Ford Explorer XLT 4.0L SOHC from North America


Watch out for radio interference problems, present in most Ford vehicles since 1990


Ball Joint/Front Suspension problems at about 20,000 miles, replaced under standard 36,000 mile warranty.

Fuel pump radio frequency interference problems, ongoing (more below).

Timing chain tensioner, replaced under Ford Campaign (hidden recall) program, at 67,000 miles.

Front timing chain replacement, at my expense, at 67,000 miles, likely directly related to the faulty timing chain tensioner.

The rear wiper almost never returns properly, frequently trapping the blade under the rear upper glass when closed.

The rear wiper blade tension is weak, meaning that most of the rear window is never cleaned.

General Comments:

First, a complaint or two about comfort:

As a tall (6' 1") driver, I find it difficult to adjust the driver's seat properly. It is at the end of its travel, both rearward, and downward. The front bolster is so thick that even in this position, it cuts off the blood in my legs when driving.

My wife is large enough to need the seat belt extender (why do the car companies put such short belts in their cars?), but the passenger side seat belt has an annoying habit of locking at the full out position (this is for locking child seats properly) and every time the Explorer goes over a bump, it tightens. After a while, she has to undo the belt, fully retract it to get it to unlock, and redo the belt. This is annoying, uncomfortable, and of course, a dangerous maneuver at highway speeds.

Now, on to the fuel pump radio noise problem. If you like to listen to distant AM stations, you are simply out of luck, with just about any model Ford since about 1990, when they started putting in-tank fuel pumps in their vehicles. There have been several technical service bulletins put out on this issue over the years (the fuel pump noise is described as "a whining or buzzing noise, coming from the vehicle speakers"), suggesting the dealer install a Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) filter kit on the fuel pump power leads (necessitating dropping the tank and removing the pump assembly -- not for the shade-tree mechanic). If the vehicle is still under warranty, Ford will attempt the fix, otherwise, it will cost you, in spite of the fact that this isn't really a warranty issue (it's a defective fuel pump design -- they left out parts that would prevent the interference, figuring that few, if any, folks would complain).

After getting the RFI filter installed (and to the dealer's credit, they agreed to do it for a $100 deductible, even after the warranty had expired), I find that there is essentially no improvement in the situation. In my opinion, the RFI filter used is a "once size fits all" solution, and more than likely isn't really tuned to exact application, here. To be really effective, the components (chokes and capacitors) need to be directly mounted on the pump terminals (inside the pump would be even better, and should have been the original design), not in some module with several inch long leads. It may be correct circuitry-wise, but it is not doing much good at radio frequencies. The noise has dropped some on the 80 meter (3.4 - 4.0 MHz) band, but it now seems even worse on other, higher frequencies.

Now, most folks would shrug this off. However, as a licensed Amateur (Ham) Radio operator for over 30 years, and having installed and used shortwave transceivers in a variety of vehicles, I've never encountered such bad interference from a vehicle system. The noise from the fuel pump completely blankets most of the shortwave bands, making all but the loudest signals inaudible.

When I initially contacted Ford customer service on their 1-800 line, the representative spent several days "researching" my problem, and ultimately told me that Ford had determined that the technical service bulletin in question did not cover my Explorer (which was incorrect -- I've since obtained a copy of the bulletin from my dealer, and it most certainly covers my vehicle, along with about two dozen other Ford models, dating back to 1990).

Aside from the recent timing chain related problems, the only real beef I've had with this vehicle has been the radio noise problems. Unfortunately, as a federally licensed station officially recognized by the Office of Homeland Security as a first responder, it has been a great source of frustration, and will ultimately more than likely cause me to prematurely trade in this vehicle, in an effort to find one that is comparable, but lacks the infamous Ford fuel pump noise problems. Even though Ford has a complete body bonding (ground straps) and RFI suppression kit, it must be factory installed, and can only be put on police interceptors (since they get loaded up with radios).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 21st October, 2003

22nd Sep 2004, 14:44

I have a 98 Explorer and was interested to read about the hidden recall on the timing chain tensioner. I have contacted Ford who inform me that there was no recall and the problem must be rectified at my own expense.

Is there a copy of the recall notice that I could obtain?