1993 Ford Mustang GT review from North America
"Good looking, but can't compete with '93 Z28"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Replaced starter, alternator, and A/C compressor before 90,000 miles.
Leaking weather stripping around both doors.
No problems with the engine or transmission, they are very tough.
General comments?
Completely stock, mine would smoke most pre-1993 Camaro V8's. If you are considering buying a GT based on performance, don't do it! Although it was a blast to drive, I regretted not getting a '93 or newer Z28. Why waste your money on aftermarket parts, when you can buy a Z28 with 275 hp stock?
Recommended reviews
| 1993 - Mustang LX Hatchback 2.3L CID Great car and well worth the money spent on it |
|
| American muscle... enough said |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1993 |
| First year of ownership | 1996 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 1997 |
| Engine and transmission | 5.0 Manual |
| Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 6 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 3 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 87000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 118000 miles |
| Previous car | Toyota Pick-up |
| Date of Entry | 13th January, 2001 |