1989 Ford Sierra Reviews - Page 2 of 9

1989 Ford Sierra GL 2.0 turbo petrol from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 2.0 turbo petrol Manual
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired94000 miles
Most recent distance103000 miles

Summary:

The ultimate Q-car

Faults:

No real faults, but lots of teething troubles associated with the engine conversion. It's not a daily driver anyway.

General Comments:

I bought a low mileage Cosworth YB engine a few years back for a Westfield project that never got off the ground. A neighbour was scrapping his above average condition Sapphire 2.0 GL after a timing chain snapped and destroyed the engine... a few beers with a mate and a silly idea formed.

After much blood, sweat and tears, too many weekends and long evenings, two near divorces, and far more money than originally envisaged, we have probably the ultimate Q-car. A baltic blue (I think) Sapphire 2.0 GL with 375 bhp worth of tuned Northampton finest under the bonnet. Outwardly, it is as standard as the day it left the factory - the keen eyed will spot that it sits a little lower than standard thanks to the Konis all round (lethal without them), and the Cosworth alloys, but these are nothing unusual on the few Sierras left today. They won't spot the Cosworth limited slip diff, Borg Warner T5 gearbox and front and rear strut braces designed to help that power onto the road, and the uprated Cosworth brakes to help stop you.

The finished car weighs 1175kg with fuel and fluids, and makes a dyno proven 375 bhp. Power to weight ratio is therefore within a sniff of a Porsche 911 GT3. As is the acceleration. This thing is searingly fast. Traction off the line is poor, and there is definitely an art to launching it with any decorum, but once rolling it will wipe the floor with almost anything. The look of sheer astonishment on the face of an E46 M3 driver only this morning as I prevented him from tailgating me by simply driving away from him was a picture. All he saw were those words. "Sapphire 2.0 GL". On a G registration Ford with a bit of rust on the bootlid and a slightly wonky rear bumper....

My neighbour who I bought the base car from thinks it's fabulous. My wife who hates modified cars squeals like a little girl every time she gets in it. Premium German saloon car drivers despise it. I love it to bits. Of course it's not a complete package like an M3 would be, and when handling is thrown into the mix, it wouldn't be all the Sierras way, but as an engineering project, as something to just enjoy in its own right, and put people in their place when required, it's just been brilliant.

There are things I want to do to it to improve the drive - Cossie Recaros would be great, as would fatter rubber and a better steering wheel, but quite honestly I will lose a chunk of interest in the car the moment it will no longer pass for standard. I keep thinking of selling it, but really what's going to be half as much fun as this for half sensible money?

I know why insurance strapped yoof make their 1.1 Saxos look fast, but to me, a car that looks slow, but will blow your doors off will always be more fun. And although this car has cost me more than anticipated, I still reckon you'd struggle to match performance per pound with anything else.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th November, 2007

20th Jun 2008, 15:31

I like your style, fella! I agree, spend the money where it counts-under the bonnet.

1989 Ford Sierra L D 2.3 diesel from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1989
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 2.3 diesel Manual
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired91000 miles
Most recent distance93000 miles

Summary:

A good all rounder, seriously cheap

Faults:

Nothing so far, fingers crossed. I carried out a full service, as it had been off the road for 4 years before I bought it.

The gearbox synchro is getting weak, probably because of the necessity of thrashing it in the intermediate gears to make satisfactory progress.

General Comments:

This was bought firmly as a cheapy banger, and in this respect it excels. I am not someone who is happy to pay out £200 a month on a new car just to watch it depreciate.

Mine is one of the last fitted with the 2.3 Peugeot engine before they went to the 1.8 turbo Ford motor. It's pretty damned slow to tell the truth; my '92 Golf 1300 will leave it for dead, but this is only noticeable on the hills. For everyday driving it's fine, returning 45 mpg.

The cabin is basic, being only an L model, with manual windows and sunroof, but it's a comfy place to be, and any driver can find a comfortable seating position.

It's an easy vehicle to service and maintain; there isn't even a timing belt to worry about.

Mine has fared better than most with the rust, as it's spent most of its life in sunny Spain, but still has the odd rusty bit on the doors- still has its original sills though.

I would recommend one to anybody; there were enough of these around in the '80s, so they can't be that bad. They suffer a poverty spec image these days, when even Mondeos can be picked up for a couple of hundred quid, but I prefer the Sierra, a much more satisfying car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 20th July, 2007

18th Sep 2007, 22:06

Quite right. but then if I DID care what anyone else thought of my car, I would be driving something newer. Truth is the only person who cares how new/fast/expensive your car is, is you. Hardly seems worth it, does it? Oh look, the 250th 07 plate BMW 3 series I've seen today... yawn.

Average review marks: 7.2 / 10, based on 37 reviews