2001 Honda Civic Reviews - Page 25 of 34

2001 Honda Civic EX 1.7 from North America

Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.7 Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.3 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance34000 miles
Previous carChevrolet Malibu

Summary:

An excellent value

Faults:

Struts had to be replaced at 30,000 miles.

Gas gauge is almost useless.

General Comments:

Bought my Civic brand new and have racked up 34,000 miles to date. Overall, I like the car, but have no misconceptions about what it is: an econobox. That being said, it feels like it's put together well and performs better than an econobox should. It's fun to drive and feels smooth and solid. The interior fit and finish are better than many previous cars I have owned.

Although the 1.7L, 127 hp motor works hard above 80 mph, the car feels more stable at high speed (around 100 mph) than it has a right to. Gearing is pretty good, but a 6th gear would have kept revs down and reduced engine noise, as well as wear and tear. The VTEC engine feels best when pulling from about 4000 RPM; a bit more horsepower would have been nice. I'd love to see the horsepower and torque curves for it.

Like many fellow owners of this car, my struts had to be replaced, and the gas gauge has been erratic (replaced once and still not accurate). I personally go by the odometer, not the gas gauge. Actual fuel economy (miles driven / gallons purchased) is typically in the low 30's, ranging from 27 or 28 when dogging it, to 37-39 milking it on long trips. Avoiding aggressive driving habits, one should be able to expect at least 30 in the city and 34 on the highway. Mileage seems to fall off when traveling at 80 or higher on the highway (again, that 6th gear would've been nice).

Handling is decent and while it's no performance car, it feels responsive and nimble. One can have fun on twisting roads and feel in control. The OEM Firestone FR 690's were simply atrocious. Noisy, poor wet traction, bad in the snow, merely acceptable in dry conditions and only lasted about 30,000 miles. Replaced them with Firestone Affinity LH30's - BIG IMPROVEMENT! When living in South Florida, I never had complaints about the ride. However, the car feels harsh & nasty on some of metro Detroit's attempts at simulating off-road conditions. No doubt Detroit's horrible road conditions hastened the need to replace the struts, but the fact that they're on national backorder this early in the vehicle's life cycle says something, don't you think?

The seats are comfortable, and there's room in the back for my kids. Also worth noting, the Coupe came standard with a cargo net, 6x9's in the rear and tweeters in the front. The Sedan came sans net and was equipped with 6.5" speakers front and rear. Come on Honda! Being a parent doesn't preclude me from liking crisper highs and deeper bass! As for leaving the cargo net off the Sedan - I simply don't get it.

All in all, the car works well for me. I don't see anything better out there without spending more money. Other cars in its class lack the refinement, styling and overall "feel" of the Civic. I'm sure the Corolla is a good car, but it looks tired and wasn't as much fun to drive. When you take a good look out there, nothing else gives you as much for as little.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 15th September, 2003

26th Feb 2004, 20:33

I have the same problem. The struts went at about 38000 and the tires lasted about the same length. Fortunately, Honda covered the struts, but I still had to pay for the labor since it was out of warranty. I'm wondering if I should ditch the car after the 12 month, 12000 mile warranty on the new struts expires.

The dealer claims that Honda corrected the manufacturing problem with the struts, but I guess I'll find out in 30000 miles.

2001 Honda Civic LX from North America

Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2001
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 4 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.4 / 10
Distance when acquired206 miles
Most recent distance97000 miles
Previous carHonda Civic

Summary:

Very costly to have serviced

Faults:

The transmission.

The front struts.

General Comments:

Transmission started to be a problem at about 50 thousand miles. Honda service said to flush the transmission. This made the problem worse..

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 9th September, 2003

29th May 2004, 16:43

Have the same problems at 50,000, but mine is an EX also from North America. Struts are leaking and transmission just gave out today.

Very disappointed in Honda.

30th Aug 2004, 16:18

I also had a 2001 Honda Civic which had transmission problems. I dropped the first transmission around 40,000 miles and had it replaced. The second transmission dropped at about 98,000 miles.

Also my back right window regulator was going bad when I got rid of the car.

Average review marks: 7.1 / 10, based on 115 reviews