1988 Jaguar XJ6 Reviews

1988 Jaguar XJ6 6 cylinder from North America

Model year1988
Year of manufacture1988
First year of ownership2009
Engine and transmission 6 cylinder Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired68000 miles
Most recent distance90000 miles
Previous carJaguar Vanden Plas

Summary:

Vintage British class that can't be matched

Faults:

Door handle broke; $150.00 for a used one.

AC hose in trunk rusted out, causing water to leak into the trunk.

Bearings on all 4 hubs replaced; $700.

Rust bubbling around trunk chrome, rear window, and front quarter panels.

Manifold intake gasket needed to be replaced; $600.00.

Annoying constant "Bulb Failure" light never went out. Why Jaguar made the warning lights so large beats me. Looked a "Space Invaders" video game.

Wood grain cracked on ash tray, impossible to find trim pieces for.

Constantly replacing fuses.

Radio antenna wouldn't go down, needed to be replaced, $250.

General Comments:

What can I say, I got this car for less than $2000, a bargain and a half. I couldn't buy a Yugo for that!

It was a striking dark gray with Burgundy interior and birds eye maple wood grain, just gorgeous! There was a lot of little things, but the car was beautiful.

The leather was OK, only a small tear in the driver's seat, and the back seat was like a couch.

I absolutely loved this car. This is the car that got me into Jags, and away from Mercedes and Japanese mass produced rice burners. 1988-89 was the last years of the "true Jaguars" before Ford took over.

The car ran great once I replace the manifold gasket and changed the plugs; fast, agile and quick for its age.

This cat sat for a while, and was happy to be out on the road again. Unfortunately, she was hit in front of my house and was totalled, so I never got to restore her to her full potential. When she was gone it was like losing a friend.

I loved the car and sought frantically to replace it, and landed a '93 Vanden Plas.

If you take care of your Jag; maintenance, care, a lot of TLC, they will serve you well. If you don't, well the car knows it, and will break down in a hail storm in the middle of nowhere with no cell phone reception, and 30 miles to the nearest garage.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 12th March, 2012

11th May 2012, 10:07

I could never sell my XJS!! You're right dead on!!! 1989 after the Ford takeover, not a true Jag!!! Now corporate... Enjoy your new one.

Gregg, Reno NV.

24th May 2012, 11:31

I own a 1988 XJ6 in Titanium with blue leather interior that I dearly love. It is extremely reliable and comfortable on long trips. I have made several round trips exceeding 1600 miles.

It does have some issues, rust popping up on the exact same spot on both rear quarter panels, trunk leaks no matter I do. The A/C blend doors aren't working, and there is next to NO info or photos available to describe that repair. The ABS accumulator is covered by a NHTSA recall, but the dealerships aren't particularly interested in effecting the repair. Fuel economy in town is atrocious, but highway mileage is quite acceptable at 25 MPG.

Yes, these are the last true all Jaguar products, but it is Ford Motor Company that saved Jaguar, Aston Martin and Volvo. It is Ford that improved the reliability of Jaguar, and Ford that finally got rid of those inboard rear brakes. In my view the last true Jaguars were the 6.0 litre models in both Saloon and XJS. The 1995-97 XJ6/XJ6R were extremely attractive and reliable. Sadly there are very, very few `95-97 XJRs left.

The new Jaguars may be wonderfully built and performing cars, but they look like Toyotas and Buicks, and nothing special. I am worried Jaguar may suffer the same fate as Packard. An excellent luxury marque very closely associated and identified by traditional styling cues, now lost in the modern saloons. It reminds me of the last Packards. Though to be fair, ugly doesn't seem to have hurt Cadillac.

18th Dec 2012, 12:46

Wondering if you had fixed the problem with trunk leaks? If so, please reply.

2nd Jan 2013, 15:50

I ended up buying two Jags; an XJ6 Vanden Plas and an 1989 XJS. Both great cars.

6th Feb 2013, 11:33

I also have a 91 XJS V12 & an 88 XJ6 Sovereign, but with the XJ6 I have a problem with trunk leaks, & the low brake pressure light stays on, & it is full. Do you know fixes for these problems? The XJS has never really caused me a problem that I haven't had a problem fixing.

1988 Jaguar XJ6 2.9 from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture1988
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 2.9 Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.3 / 10
Distance when acquired67000 miles
Most recent distance162354 miles
Previous carJaguar XJ6

Faults:

Very little, apart from a replacement alternator, fuel pump and new shocks all round. Everything else has been consumables, such as exhaust system, brake pads, tyres etc.

General Comments:

This car has been (and still is) excellent. It has never let me down in the years I have owned it, and I still find it a real pleasure to drive.

The XJ40 was a massive improvement on the previous models. Having had the dubious pleasure of a series 2, 3.4 ltr and a 4.2 series 3, believe me, there is no comparison. The series 1 through 3 Jaguars were shocking in almost every respect. Non-existent build quality, crap XK engines that were knackered at about 70,000 miles, rust from top to bottom, and endless breakdowns and failures. I am not one of these who looks at series Jags through rose tinted, "classic" glasses. Still, each to their own, and I can only speak as I find, or have found.

Anyway, back to the 40. Personally I like the styling. Can't really see what all the fuss is about with the curves. They may look alright on your missus, but not necessarily on cars. The 40 is chunky and unmistakeably a Jaguar, which is more than can be said for the new models, good as they may be.

That said, the old 40 is not without some niggling faults, often in the electrical department. Rarely do these prevent the car from running, and most owners shrug their shoulders and learn to live with them.

Engine wise, the AJ6 units are robust pieces of kit, which given regular servicing, may well outlive their owners. The 2.9 has an unfair reputation for poor reliability. Take this with a pinch of salt. They are infinitely better than the XK engine, and if it's timing chain trouble you're looking for, then buy an XJ8 and all your prayers will be answered!

One thing to watch on all AJ6 engines is the potential to clog the breather pipes with oil residue, which looks like mayonnaise, which upon sight would have most people running for the hills, convinced the head gasket was about to expire. Fear not my friends, on these engines it's a fairly normal occurrence. Don't leave it there too long though, as it will eventually impair performance and lead to some pretty erratic running. A couple of hours to clean the pipes, and all will be well.

Mechanically these cars are fairly conventional, with most jobs well within the scope of your average D.I.Y owner. At least you won't be cursing for hours over those ridiculous inboard brakes found on previous models. Nice and straightforward on the 40.

On post '90 models, one job that is guaranteed to raise the suicide rate, is swapping the fuel pump. Not a problem on early cars, but on post '90 cars it lives in the fuel tank. Whichever bright spark decided on this "improvement" really ought to be executed. By the time you're halfway through this job, you'll be seriously considering scrapping the entire car and buying another one. It really is a pain in the backside, and everywhere else for that matter.

Interiors wear well, much better than the X300 and the XJ8, both of which suffered from Ford's penny pinching influence. Exception to this is the headlining, which are often found in various stages of collapse. It amazes me that after all these years, Jaguar still don't have a clue on how to make a decent headlining. However it's a relatively small problem, but not a particularly cheap one to cure.

Jaguars in general, and the XJ40 in particular, don't suffer fools gladly. Skimp on maintenance, particularly on fluid changes, and you can get ready for hell to break loose. They WILL get their own back. On the other hand, a well looked after example can be a rewarding experience. No other car on this planet offers so much for so little. I love mine, and I think you might just love it as-well. Give the 40 a chance.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 29th March, 2011

Average review marks: 7.5 / 10, based on 12 reviews