Absolutely nothing wrong!
This is a very smooth riding car! Nothing rough about it. Turning, shifting, everything in general, just very smooth all around.
It's more of a plain looking car, but yet sporty. More of a low rider, which also adds to the good looks of this car. Lots of power for passing, off the line, etc.
Overall I am very happy with my car.
I purchased a 94 Cutlass in April of 2000. When I first bought it, it was great. I have noticed some rough gear switches. Have you noticed an engine knock when you start yours up? Mine is very loud. I was told it was common with the 3.1L engine. Is this true?
Please email me at lespeches@hotmail.com
I have noticed that with my 92 cutlass, the knock goes away as soon as it warms up.
I purchased my 1994 Olds Cutlass Supreme SL in 1999. I have had to replace the alternator twice, front brakes, and rear brakes.
The passenger side back window leaks when it rains.
Turning signal/wiper arm switch does not work. Turn signal does not at all, and the wipers only work with the turn signal pushed down for a left hand turn.
Lately it has running high, idling at 2000rpm's. Ready to junk it! 3.1 engine is good, peppy but the transmission sucks.
niedermier@yahoo.com
97 Olds Cutlass Supreme. Bought as program car 34,000. The
lock-up convertor went at 87,000. This plus clutches seals
etc, for the trans cost $750. Thin front rotors from the
factory warp at 6 to 8 month intervals. Replacing brakes
and rotors are a constant headache. Gear shift selector lever pin fell out causing lever to fall off of column. Dash knobs made in Mexico broke off under warranty. Cutouts
for fuse covers fall off. Seat belt retractors had to be
replaced. Auto door locks cause screws behind inside door
handles to back out and fall off. Starter had a ground in it
and had to be replaced a 80,000. 3.1 V 6 is cheap on gas
but pecks on cold start-up at 100,00 miles...
I got a 1994 olds cutlass supreme, it needs a timing belt. is it hard to put one on.stokes350@hotmail.com.thank you brent stoker.