1996 Saturn SL Reviews - Page 17 of 24

1996 Saturn SL 1.6L from North America

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership1996
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.6L Manual
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 2 / 10
Dealer Service marks 2 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 2 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
2.6 / 10
Distance when acquired112 miles
Most recent distance79000 miles
Previous carChevrolet Malibu

Summary:

You get what you pay for, but park far away from your house just in case..

Faults:

We had numerous visits to Saturn for repairs over the years. At first they were fairly minimal and covered by the warranty.

Had it in 7 or 8 times for check engine light, faulty brakes (manufacturer issue, replaced for free) cooling system issues.

Car began seriously going through oil right about the time it hit 50,000 miles. I have always changed my oil religiously every 3 months, so I know this was not due to driver negligence. Gas mileage also began dropping at this point. I was getting about 40 mpg highway and ended up at about 29mpg.

April of 2003, the car would not shift into first gear. Cost 1,200 to REPAIR transmission synchronizer plate. Still did not shift right.

Continual electrical problems with inside lighting and car lighter. Dome light worked when it felt like it (not very often) and lighter stopped working altogether.

October 2003: Woke at 2:30 am to the sound of my car horn blaring. Ran out to find my car in flames. Poor thing was screaming and trying to blow itself out with the cooling fan :). It melted and flamed right before my eyes before the fire department could arrive to put it out. This was not a smoldering burn it was a "movie" type car fire and if it had been parked in my driveway it would have set the house on fire. Cause of fire is, as of yet, unknown. I will post if they figure it out.

General Comments:

I loved my car despite its many faults.

It had a lot of road noise and the seals around the windows let in a lot of air even when rolled up.

The seats were very basic and not comfortable on long drives.

The engine tended to overheat quickly in warmer weather if you got stuck in any kind of traffic.

Mine did not have power steering and was akin to driving a go cart...very tough on the arms when parking.

The 4 cylinder engine had no gumption and would bog down considerably going up hills. Forget running the air if the hill was very steep.

Overall, the car was reliable... in that it RAN. The frequent trips to the very expensive service department were irritating and the rapid decline of mileage and increase in oil usage were worrisome. After the $2,000 I have put into it in repairs and maintenance in the past 6 months, I would still love to look out and see it parked there on the curb instead of the blackened char mark that is the remains of the car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 16th October, 2003

9th Mar 2004, 11:54

Your story was interesting. I got a chuckle out of how you described the fire. I have a 1996 Saturn SL, for the most part it has not been terribly bad, after having it for 7 years, most of the defects are beginning to show, sunroof leakage, Ignition - No Start, or Stall Then Long Crank/DTCs P0300..etc.

Jennifer in NC

1996 Saturn SL SL1 1.9L from North America

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.9L Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 0 / 10
Comfort marks 3 / 10
Dealer Service marks 2 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.6 / 10
Distance when acquired130000 miles
Most recent distance134000 miles
Previous carFord Ranger

Summary:

A rip-off company

Faults:

A few good things about this vehicle are, great on gas, small engine... good pickup.

I drove this car only a few thousand miles until the 3rd cylinder went bad. After I had spoken with a car mechanic, I found out, either the engine would have to be rebuilt, which can range anywhere from 2,000-4,000, or get another engine, which can cost around 1900. From what I was recently told, Saturn cars usually won't last past 90,000 miles.

Right up until cylinder 3 died, my car ran fine, no lights on the dash were on. The car appeared to be normal.

In fact I have a friend who had the same car as me; his seized up after he added more oil. Weird huh? Anyhow, I think Saturn needs to redesign their engines, something needs to change to up their standards of quality!!!

General Comments:

If you're looking for a car, don't get a Saturn, you will regret it if you do! They're cheaply made.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 10th September, 2003

Average review marks: 6.5 / 10, based on 84 reviews