1999 Saturn SL SL1 review from North America
"A light and fast, good looking car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The tires are too slim does not stick to the road.
Saturn should have put fat factory tires on her.
General comments?
I love my car, It looks great warms up fast, takes off when you need it to.
I recommend buying it rather than a Cavalier or Sun-fire, it is just a lot more comfortable to drive.
The SATURN SL1 is Spacious and Economical.
Recommended reviews
| 1999 - SL SL2 1.9L DOHC four cylinder Amazingly reliable with minimal maintenance |
| 1998 - SL 2 1.9L 16-valve DOHC Affordable, unbreakable compact with the soul of a sport sedan |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1999 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.9L 5 SPD Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 33000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 34000 kilometres |
| Previous car | CHEV Monte Carlo SS |
| Date of Entry | 17th January, 2003 |