Similar Saturn SL reviews

1996
USA Flag Canada Flag

SL 2

Tiresomely reliable, occasionally fun

330 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

SL 1

Never again!

322 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

SL

It's reliable, driveable, practical, and all around pleasure to own

307 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

SL SL2

There are better choices

301 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

SL 2

An unsafe money pit

298 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

SL 2

Good car if you don't mind working on it

298 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

SL

Good little car gets a bad rap

296 words
All Saturn SL reviews

1996 Saturn SL SL2 review from North America

"There are better choices"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Just to let you know, I am very good with cars and do all of the repairs myself. This vehicle is meticulously maintained. I bought it new in 1996.

Front pipe cracked/rusted at 135,000 at the transmission support bracket. Dealer wanted to charge $850 to replace front pipe/ converter as a single unit. I took the broken pipe off myself and had the cracked welded for $15.

Saturn oem muffler rusts out about every two years.

Struts replaced at 75,000 miles.

Brake rotors warp often, but I now buy higher quality non-dealer rotors and it is less of a problem.

Oil consumption first started around 80,000mi, but switching to 10W-30 helped a great deal. There is some evidence of antifreeze getting into the oil because of a white film on the bottom of the oil filler cap.

Rear sway bar links rattled and were replaced at 85,000mi. Poorly designed part, grease caps feel off causing premature failure.

Manual transmission leaks around the axle seals, but not enough to warrant repair.

Check engine light comes on often, fault is usually the upper O2 sensor, which has been replaced three times.

Spark plugs foul easily and are replaced every 8-10,000 miles.

Clear coat paint on trunk lid spoiler scratches easily.

Rust has been a problem on all four door sills, and in engine compartment. Single layer of flat black paint on inner frame is prone to rust. Most manufacturers use multiple layers of paint.

General comments?

For the money, was and still is a good car. You get what you pay for. It has good power, a fairly decent ride, and always starts. I feel some Saturn parts are poor quality and designed to wear quickly to keep people going in for dealer repairs. Saturn (GM) is not the only one to do this.

3 comments

Recommended reviews

USA Flag Canada Flag

1996 - SL

It's reliable, driveable, practical, and all around pleasure to own

USA Flag Canada Flag

1996 - SL 2 1.9 DOHC

An unsafe money pit

All 1996 Saturn SL reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership1996
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 1.9 Twin Cam Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 6.8 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance140000 miles
Previous carPlymouth Horizon
Date of Entry 8th January, 2005

All Saturn SL reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews